What Should We Eat Now?
What we eat is in constant flux, changing from decade to decade and century to century.
What we eat is in constant flux, changing from decade to decade and century to century.
It may seem counter intuitive, but the greatest single tool we have to reconnect to our soils is this waste itself.
As I try, without sounding like an idiot, to define the kind of economy best suited for sustainable farming, I think of the old monastic farm and then I do sound like an idiot.
U.S. beekeeping is undergoing changes and challenges.
George Monbiot, bless him, has recently been tweeting his enthusiasm for my critique of the Ecomodernist Manifesto (‘Dark thoughts on Ecomodernism‘)
Thanks to people like Arthur Levine, local and urban agriculture in San Bernardino County is experiencing a burgeoning grassroots movement.
In these turbulent times, we need to make our food supply systems more resilient. Producing and distributing food on the local level could help us weather disruptions of all kinds.
Resilience is a common principal of permaculture, says Dave Boehnlein, co-author of the book Practical Permaculture.
A mobile fresh food market, the truck offers locally sourced fruits, vegetables, grains, legumes, tea, and bread to asylum seekers at a 75% discount.
Underlying so much of the economic and ecological turmoil unfolding before us is a slow collision between the operating practices of the resource-wasting, vertically-managed 20th century and the much more crowded, polluted, and dangerous ecological and economic conditions of the 21st century.
Just three grass family plants – wheat, rice and maize – furnish about half the energy we eat worldwide.
To make it simple as a crayon sketch, there are two ways to mitigate climate change that, in tandem, could work.