Energy Policy

“We Have Solutions in Hand: an interview with Dr. Michael Webber”

by

I think we can solve this problem. If we look at it from an engineering or technical perspective, we have solutions in hand that we can build out in the next decade that would reduce our carbon dramatically. We could double our nuclear, we could double our natural gas for electric power, ramp up wind and solar dramatically while cutting back our coal use 80 percent…Just because we could do it as engineers with off-the-shelf technology that exists today within a decade does not mean that the policy, economic, or cultural hurtles are not real.

Gazprom trifecta of woes a potential boon to Europe, the Caspian Sea

by

Gazprom, the largest natural gas company in the world, is experiencing a moment of truth. And so, by extension, is Russia, which has relied on the behemoth for a large part of its tax revenue, and as a spearpoint of its foreign policy. The main ramifications are a shakeup in security presumptions in Europe and on the Caspian Sea, both of which until recently have seemed to be under Gazprom’s thumb.

Climate & environment – Mar 29

by

-California: climate change law won’t hurt economy
-Forest loss slows, as China plants and Brazil preserves
-Exclusive Excerpt: Hack the Planet
-Breaking the Growth Habit: A Q&A with Bill McKibben
-How the Conservatives dodged the climate bullet
-NASA: It is nearly certain that a new record 12-month global temperature will be sent in 2010
-The Secret of Sea Level Rise: It Will Vary Greatly by Region
-The Big Melt
-A Pioneering Biologist Discusses The Keys to Forest Conservation

Quacks like a duck…

by

According to an article in Le Monde on March 25, the US Department of Energy “admits that ‘a chance exists that we may experience a decline’ of world liquid fuels production between 2011 and 2015 ‘if the investment is not there.'” This bombshell emerged in “an exclusive interview with Glen Sweetnam, main official expert on the oil market in the Obama administration.”

UK Telegraph Reports, “Oil Reserves ‘Exaggerated by One Third'”

by

Earlier this week, the UK Telegraph reported: Oil reserves ‘exaggerated by one third’

The world’s oil reserves have been exaggerated by up to a third, according to Sir David King, the Government’s former chief scientist, who has warned of shortages and price spikes within years.

Alaska: Confronting the Prospect of 6 Billion Barrels of Stranded Gas

by

Alaska — and the so-called Sarah Palin pipeline — are in the crosshairs of the abrupt surge of natural gas supplies in the continental United States. Leading the charge against a much-promoted pipeline to ship Alaskan natural gas into the currently glutted Lower 48 is former Sen. Ted Stevens. The locally influential Republican says the gas should be rerouted to Asia, and that if Alaska doesn’t move fast, this fuel — the equivalent of 6 billion barrels of oil — could end up effectively stranded at home.

The peak oil crisis: a breakthrough?

by

It came as a surprise that last weekend Britain’s Energy Minister summoned a meeting of business leaders to discuss the government’s response to a decline in global oil production should it actually be imminent. Just last summer, a UK government formally rejected the notion that the demand for oil would soon overtake available supplies leading to much higher prices and global economic disruptions.

Government ‘Peak Oil Summit’ Starts the Process of Government Acknowledging Peak Oil?

by

On Monday Peter Lipman and I represented Transition Network at an event which could potentially be the day people look back to as the day when UK government finally starting to ‘get’ peak oil. Fascinating and frustrating in equal measure, the event, “Policy Response to potential future oil supply constraints”, was billed as “a half-day workshop hosted by the Energy Institute in partnership with the Department of Energy and Climate Change, under Chatham House Rules”. For those who don’t know what Chatham House rules are, it means that the contents of what was said can be discussed, but none of it can be attributed to anyone.