A world in trouble (Michael Ruppert interview)
Mike talks to the average citizen about where we stand in the energy crisis.
Mike talks to the average citizen about where we stand in the energy crisis.
In principle, there is no sustainable rate of extraction for non-renewable resources: every instance of extraction represents a step toward “running out.
First of all, I care because I think many small churches are closing for the same reason small farms are closing, that is, false notions about economics. The general thinking is that it is more profitable to cram more people into fewer, bigger churches just like it is more profitable to cram more hogs into fewer, bigger barns.
For me, responding meaningfully to what we face comes through community based action, and the crucial, critical role that communities have to play needs far greater recognition.
The same conclusion could be drawn for all the post-bubble economies, and of course it is important that we ‘learn the lessons of Iceland’ in terms of crony capitalism and financial instability. But for a green economist the most important lesson is the need to reconnect finance with the real economy. When finance runs out of control the consequence in unsustainability as well as instability. An economy in a steady state would return money to its proper role as a medium of exchange.
It is coming to the point that one’s world outlook has to be modified every few months as the old ways of looking at things are changed by events. So it is with oil — supply, demand and, of course, price. At the beginning of the year the future of oil was thought to be mostly about China and how fast its economy and demand for oil would grow during 2011. In last two months, however, the world situation has changed markedly and we now have a multiplicity of factors vying to influence the global oil markets in ways as yet unknown.
A retired nuclear scientist gives his take on the events in Japan and the possible dangers to Americans.:
“One possibly worrisome long-term scenario is that the Fukushima-I plant is RIGHT on the Japanese east coast. I wondered about ocean currents and where they might deliver any radiation entering the ocean, AND what uptake and concentration mechanisms might be operable in sea-life in the various ocean ecosystems.
“The contaminants move through the ocean’s various food-chains, ultimately to species humans eat, potentially accumulating near the top of the food chains.
“Here on the U.S. coast we have become attuned to food-chain concentration of mercury in aquatic and other life, although I have no knowledge of the environmental pathways. Are we facing the possibility of a similar problem with some radioactive and heavy element species one, two, or three decades hence? Could my children’s salmon contain Japanese reactor fission products?”
Coming, as I do, from an alcoholic family, I have a tendency to watch any unfolding disaster with a single idea in the back of my mind: “I knew it.” This is even true of a disaster like the one in Japan, where the causes are seemingly so unpredictable.
From the Fukushima nuclear crisis to the civil war in Libya, a rising spiral of troubles that may just mark a new phase in the predicament of industrial society is being met more and more often with what amount to incantations. As something of a specialist in incantations, the Archdruid suggests that something more practical may be needed just now.
There are greener, cheaper, more secure, quicker to install, safer alternatives to new nuclear so don’t let yourself be persuaded that it’s the only solution. It’s not.
– Official: Japan’s Nuclear Situation Nearing Severity of Chernobyl
– Nuclear industry in turmoil after Japan quake
– Disruptions of Power and Water Threaten Japan’s Economy
– NYT: Reactor Design in Japan Has Long Been Questioned
– Nuclear power: when the answer becomes the problem
– What will spark the next Fukushima?
– Nuclear power: After the flood