Recorded on:
Aug 11, 2025
Description
In this week’s Frankly, Nate unpacks some key blindspots of “the walrus movement”—a placeholder label that’s a gentle nod to those championing bold social and ecological ideals. While mostly well-intentioned, this “movement” can miss the stark limits of our planet’s unfolding biophysical reality.
What happens when lofty goals sidestep ecological and energetic realities? How might we incorporate these oversights to drive clear, purposeful action towards a (more) sustainable future? And how do we ground ourselves in biophysical truths while envisioning a system that better serves the planet and its people?
Show Notes & Links to Learn More
03:19 – optimal foraging theory
04:31 – plant nutrient uptake, leafcutter ants
06:10 – capitalism definition
06:35 – status seeking psychology, instant gratification seeking psychology
06:55 – agriculture + social hierarchy
07:13 – Ronald Wright A Short History of Progress
07:51 – image: Diego Rivera, The great city of Tenochtitlán. National Palace, Mexico. 1925-35.
08:15 – early world civilizations, energy surplus and ancient civilizations
08:38 – maximum power principle
09:15 – the economic superorganism
10:58 – authoritarianism
12:04 – psychological causes and societal consequences of authoritarianism
14:13 – inequality fuels high crime and low trust
14:50 – humans’ evolved pleasure circuits
15:35 – E. O. Wilson quote origin
15:50 – Starbucks CEO vs barista pay, CEO vs Employee Salaries
15:55 – regions will become inhabitable as warming increases
18:31 – big oil’s role in blocking regulations, big oil’s PR war
19:30 – IMF claims that Exxon/Shell are bilking societies 5 trillion per year in subsidies
20:20 – state-owned oil companies
22:33 – what goes into a solar panel
23:34 – ecological overshoot, Overshoot and Its 7 Fundamental Drivers
24:43 – Modern Monetary Theory
25:52 – the Cantillon Effect
30:00 – nature and nurture in psychology
30:17 – tribalism
Comments
Welcome to the new Resillience commenting system!
We have moved from the former Disqus commenting system to a new system as of September 10, 2026.
We made this change because of privacy concerns regarding Disqus. It's also part of a set of changes to bring more services to the Resilience community under a single login: commenting, (coming September 2026), and online courses (coming 2027). Unfortunately, your old Disqus comments may not reliably link to your account in this new system. Please contact us if you have any questions or concerns.
WOw that was terrific! Thank you so much , I hope many people listen, watch, and or read this. I intend to share it as widely as I can
Surplus is not the rule of living things, balance is.
Surplus agriculture is the basis of all civilization, but that does not mean that it is a biological imperative or an intrinsic human activity. Using tools and living in community are fundamentally human, but using a draft animal or human slaves to pull a plow to till the soil was and is not an imperative . The agriculturalists have obviously out competed the hunter gatherers, but is that a good thing? Cancer is a fatal disease for an individual organism, for the same reasons that human activities of tillage and industrialization could well prove fatsl for the Earth 'organism' unless we humans get back in balance.