Environment featured

What is causing record-shattering heat?

July 19, 2024

Pavement in Phoenix is now hot enough to cause serious burns, causing a rise in burn cases from falls. ”pavement temperatures can easily reach 160 to 170 degrees F” said Kevin Foster, director of the Valleywise Health’s Diane & Bruce Halle Arizona Burn Center in Phoenix. “New Heat Map Shows Scorching Streets that Can Burn Skin in Seconds”, https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/new-nasa-heat-map-shows-scorching-streets-that-Acan-burn-skin-in-seconds/. While severe burns are clearly a problem, do these high surface temperatures have other implications?

A few days after the article on skin-burns, the Associated Press warned, “More records expected to shatter as long-running blanket of heat threatens 130 million in U.S. (https://apnews.com/article/heat-wave-record-temperatures-2ca3046bf74ca596b24a2879d8dcf664) Phoenix set a new record of 1180 F, and Death Valley beat its record by 50 F.

A few days after that, the AP noted record breaking heat in Las Vegas, setting an all-time record of 1200 F. https://apnews.com/video/heat-waves-las-vegas-weather-national-national-ff1279056240469998be30ca8a240201

Climatic warming has been attributed to heat trapped by greenhouse gases. But where does the heat come from?

When I first went to Australia with my wife, I noticed how much things cost. Australians understood this. They know they are a small economy, a long way away, and shipping is expensive. That is all true. Because they understood the reasons for high prices, they did not seek additional evidence. They saw high-prices as unfortunate, but an acceptable cost for living in a wonderful country. I saw their acceptance as a license for high prices. Shop owners could charge whatever they wanted, and would not be challenged on price.

It is the same for greenhouse gases. Once science discovered that greenhouse gases trap heat, raising temperatures, no further cause for increasing temperatures was sought. But does the climate science discovered before greenhouse gases provide Insight?

Luke Howard (1772 – 1864), an English chemist (pharmacist) was the first to document and analyze heat islands. He published “The Climate of London: Deduced from Meteorological Observations” in 1818, with a second volume in 1820.

The importance of the planet’s surface was discovered in the 1820s when Fourier, (1768 – 1830) a French physicist and mathematician, recognized that: “The atmosphere…. absorbs infrared radiation rising from the earth’s sun-warmed surface” (Henson, 2019:30).

Howard determined that London was 1.570F warmer than surrounding areas. In urban areas today, home to over half the world’s population, heat islands are typically 50F to 90F above outlying areas.  However, a doctoral dissertation notes a case where temperatures were 260F higher, (Kim, JP, & Guldmann, JM, 2014). Differences of that magnitude reflect the conditions we see in these heat waves.

Howard’s analysis of the causes of higher urban temperatures is effectively the same as current experts. Lisa Garland (2011) lists the six causes of heat islands as:

  1. Reduced evaporation.
  2. Increased heat storage.
  3. Increased net radiation.
  4. Reduced convection.
  5. Increased Anthropogenic heat.
  6. Systemic interactions.

Garland lists “Reduced evaporation” as the primary cause of increased temperatures. Evaporation requires moisture. Howard noted: “the country has an almost inexhaustible store of moisture to supply its evaporation – that of the city is very speedily exhausted, even after heavy rain.” (Howard, 1820: 106).

Therefore, dry environments, and anywhere drainage systems prevent rainfall from soaking into the soil, as is the case in most urban and many suburban areas, experience reduced evaporation and increased temperatures. Because most evaporation takes place as transpiration through vegetation, reducing vegetation and increasing bare soil also decreases transpiration. That condition is made worse when the soil is covered with pavement. Is It any wonder cities in arid climates like Phoenix and Las Vegas are setting new highs?

The other causes result more directly from the built environment. Increased heat storage is a function of the properties of construction materials. Increased net (heat capturing) radiation is largely a function of the proximity of buildings, and their geometric relationships. Decreased convection is a function of buildings blocking the cooling effects of air-flow. Anthropogenic heat is the thermal pollution we create, intensified in urban areas where populations are denser. Systemic interactions are the ways each of these, impact the others.

However, the context is problematic. While measuring heat islands against surrounding areas is the generally accepted practice, it obscures reality. Certainly, suburban and rural outlying areas have more vegetation and less of the heat generating and trapping conditions of cities. But development destroys nature, reduces photosynthesis and transpiration, and increases heat generation from sunlight. To a greater or lesser extent, the entire planet has been impacted by these conditions. Where will you find “undisturbed,” outlying areas?

That fact has two implications. One, we have underestimated the extent of heat islands because we have no “0” baseline to measure against. And two, the entire planet is radiating excess heat. We have created a Heat Planet.

Thus, the conversion of sunlight into heat is the source that creates heat islands, and increasingly warms the atmosphere. Greenhouse gases, trap that heat like a pot lid, exacerbating warming. But to reduce the elevated temperatures we are experiencing, we need to address the source of the heat generation, akin to turning down the stove.

Christopher Haines can be reached at [email protected]

References

Garland, L (2011) Heat Islands: Understanding and Mitigating Heat in Urban Areas. Washington D.C.: Earthscan Publishing.

Henson, R, (2019) The Thinking Person’s Guide to Climate Change, 2nd Ed. Boston, Ma. American Meteorological Society.

Howard, L, (1820) the Climate of London: Deduced from Meteorological Observations Volume 2. London, W. Phillips, George Yard. (2012, New York, Cambridge University Press.)

Kim, Jun-Pill & Guldmann, Jean-Michel (2014) Land-use planning and the urban heat island, Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, v 41:1077 – 1099.

Christopher Haines

My architecture career spanned energy efficiency, preservation, building science, and regenerative design.  I taught undergraduate and graduate classes on architectural technology, environmental management, and urban sustainability. I published articles on degrowth economics, urbanism, and the impacts of the human brain.

My involvement with Biodiversity for a Livable Climate turned my attention to the intersection of climate, biodiversity and the built environment. My epiphany “where does the heat come from?” instigated writing a book on this hopeful climate paradigm. My peer-reviewed article: “Greenhouse Gases: True but Not the Whole Truth”, is available online.

Comments

Welcome to the new Resillience commenting system!

We have moved from the former Disqus commenting system to a new system as of September 10, 2026.

  • Your past comments have not disappeared.
  • You can log in with your old Disqus credentials, as well as Gmail credentials or a Resilience account (formerly Resilience+). Login with Facebook and other credentials is coming soon.

We made this change because of privacy concerns regarding Disqus. It's also part of a set of changes to bring more services to the Resilience community under a single login: commenting, (coming September 2026), and online courses (coming 2027). Unfortunately, your old Disqus comments may not reliably link to your account in this new system. Please contact us if you have any questions or concerns.

Subscribe
Notify of
1 Comment
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
PattiMichelle Sheaffer
PattiMichelle Sheaffer
2 years ago

As large-scale atmospheric flows slow during climate breakdown, heatwaves will be ramping up rapidly. This will be an important issue because semiconductor heterojunctions in solar cells are well-understood to stop working above certain temperatures. I already run mine under shadecloth to minimize the buildup of junction-diffusion-related damage, extending their lifetime. Although extending their lifetimes is wise, it is, ultimately, not a solution since these are among the highest-tech items ever built by mankind, and so unlikely to survive a large-scale breakdown in the food supply.

Hah! Wind power. So when I started working in science in the 70's, we had to work with really crappy electrical motors. AlNiCo was the main permanent magnet available, and it's field strength was so low that motors were really poor (magnetically "soft"). It wasn't until rare earth magnets were invented that everything got electrified – even toy 'copters which can fly for miles! This is a tech revolution unlikely to survive a food-production meltdown.

I have two artificial hips and an artificial knee. I had a PVNS tumor in a knee, and an infection in one of the artificial hips. I have had many long surgeries which have saved my life repeatedly. I don't have enough knowledge to know the fate of our modern medical care in a food-meltdown. The only knowledge I do have is polymer science (and, of course, antimicrobials). Production of all the tubie-stuff and glove/mask/etc. is likely to not survive a food-meltdown.

The idea of "Lifeboats" (Reed/Bendel) comes to mind, but no limited community of scientists can sustain anything like our current technology. For example Extractive Metallurgy technology digs holes in the ground to dig out ores, which are crushed, purified, smelted, etc., to feed into metals production (iron, aluminum, silicon, rare earths…). Imagine a bunch of lab-coated scientists trying to dig open-pit mines!