Environment featured

Messy business: Polluted ‘biosolids’ derail recycling of human waste

June 2, 2024

Many years ago a civil engineer explained to me the wisdom of taking solid biological residues from sewage treatment plants—dubbed biosolids—and using them on farm fields and garden plots. After all, nature intended for human wastes to return to the soil to replenish it in the same way animal manure has long been used to fertilize farm fields.

“What about all the industrial chemicals that end up in wastewater,” I asked. He replied that these weren’t significant enough to be concerned. I was skeptical.

Fast forward to last week when the U.S. Congress took up a proposal to allocate $500 million to compensate farmers whose livelihoods have been undermined by applying biosolids—what most of us call sewage sludge—to their cropland. It turns out that those biosolids have poisoned both land and livestock across the United States. The ostensible concern is so-called “forever chemicals,” ones used to make such products as Teflon, firefighting foam, stain-resistant upholstery and water-resistant sports gear. These chemicals are linked to “cancer, liver damage, decreased fertility, and increased risk of asthma and thyroid disease.” They are dangerous to human and animal health even at very low levels. The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) this year proposed limiting certain of these chemicals to less than 10 parts per trillion in drinking water. In two cases, the proposed limit is 4 parts per trillion.

A recent study of 2,500 human subjects showed that nearly all of them have PFAS chemicals—the formal name for this group of chemicals which number in the thousands—in their blood. Some 1,593 water systems in the United States are known so far to be contaminated. These chemicals ought to have the description “everywhere chemicals” added to their name.

But believe it or not, this is just the tip of the iceberg when it comes to contamination of biosolids. A 2022 report on chemicals found by EPA’s examination of biosolids around the country lists 726 chemicals. These include chemicals used in pesticides, drugs, cosmetics, and flame retardants as well as dioxins and polychlorinated biphenyls (widely used in electric transformers and highly carcinogenic).

For many years the EPA has assured farmers that biosolids are safe. The agency is still promoting them as a way to improve the fertility of the soil. (Inquisitive readers might like to know that organic agriculture regulations prohibit the use of biosolids or sewage sludge of any kind.)

The biosolids issue demonstrates clearly why the so-called circular economy is an impossibility in a modern industrial society. The chemicals produced by the modern economy are too many—over 150,000 by a recent count—and too easily dispersed to be segregated from the waste stream.

That’s just the way the chemical industry likes it. It would be exceedingly expensive to prevent all leakage of toxic chemicals into the environment—and downright counterproductive in the case of pesticides and herbicides which must be broadly dispersed to be effective. And, it would be considerably more expensive to find substitutes that are nontoxic and biodegradable. No one in the chemical industry is going to do either of these things if they don’t have to.

Ask yourself how many times the chemical industry and their mouthpieces in universities have told us not worry about chemicals in the environment. The concentrations are too small to hurt us, they say. Then, ask yourself whether you want to sit down to a meal of grains grown using biosolids and meat and milk products from animals dining on those same grains. Yum!

Photo: “Necessary” (outdoor privy) at Mount Vernon. Photo by Sudhirkk (2012). Via Wikimedia Commons https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:The_Necessary.JPG .

The following description is as appeared in the monument site itself. “Necessary: A necessary was an outdoor privy, or toilet. Not only did it provide convenience, but the necessary also encouraged the centralized collection of waste. It demonstrated George Washington’s awareness of the importance of controlling sanitation. Human waste was deposited in large wooden drawers below the seats. The drawers were removable, and the waste could be recycled as fertilizer in the gardens. This structure was rebuilt on the original site.”

Kurt Cobb

Kurt Cobb is a freelance writer and communications consultant who writes frequently about energy and environment. His work has appeared in The Christian Science Monitor, Common Dreams, Le Monde Diplomatique, Oilprice.com, OilVoice, TalkMarkets, Investing.com, Business Insider and many other places. He is the author of an oil-themed novel entitled Prelude and has a widely followed blog called Resource Insights. He is currently a fellow of the Arthur Morgan Institute for Community Solutions.


Tags: fertilizer, Waste

Comments

Welcome to the new Resillience commenting system!

We have moved from the former Disqus commenting system to a new system as of September 10, 2026.

  • Your past comments have not disappeared.
  • You can log in with your old Disqus credentials, as well as Gmail credentials or a Resilience account (formerly Resilience+). Login with Facebook and other credentials is coming soon.

We made this change because of privacy concerns regarding Disqus. It's also part of a set of changes to bring more services to the Resilience community under a single login: commenting, (coming September 2026), and online courses (coming 2027). Unfortunately, your old Disqus comments may not reliably link to your account in this new system. Please contact us if you have any questions or concerns.

Subscribe
Notify of
7 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
James R. Martin
2 years ago

"Biosolids" are among the biggest scams and hoaxes ever perpetraited, as I point out in this article.:

https://www.resilience.org/stories/2022-10-17/the-energy-transition-narrative/

Gunnar_Rundgren
Gunnar_Rundgren
2 years ago

Thanks for article. I agree on the criticism against the "biosolids" themselves. Unfortunately, as the title implies, the sludge has also given any use of human waste a bad reputation. Equally unfortunate is that the ban on biosolids in organic agriculture is in most places also extended to a ban on any use of human faeces or human urine in organic farming regardess of the circumstances. Admittedly, you will find PFAS and other forever chemicals in that too as you will in most water and soils. But it still makes sense to recycle the stuff as long as it isn't mixed with outher flows. A "pure" environment doesn't exist anymore.

Gunnar_Rundgren
Gunnar_Rundgren
2 years ago

The urine can also be used directly to nitrogen-greedy crops (diluted approximately 10 times). It goes under the name "gold water" in Sweden.

Jan Steinman
2 years ago

Urine is notoriously nitrogen-rich, though. It's not a balanced fertilizer.

But do you heat with wood? Make a slurry of your stove ash, wait for it to settle, decant the water off, combine it with an equal part urine and eight parts water, and you have a lovely, balanced 1:1:1 fertilizer that can be run through dripline!

mwildfire
mwildfire
2 years ago

It needs to be said that humanure actually SHOULD be recycled, as, even more so,should our urine. The problem is that city sewage infrastructure indiscriminately collects rainwater and everything it washes down into the system–and that Americans use excessive drugs. My rural household has a composting outhouse with five buckets, which when full are dumped into bins,with a layer of leaves, to sit for a year before being used in my orchard. The urine, collected separately, gets dumped in sequence on my nine or ten compost piles.
The term "biosolids" was made up by industry to sanitize "sewage sludge" as it sounded icky.

Daniel Cooper
Daniel Cooper
2 years ago

If the contaminated sludge is not put on fields, it ends up in rivers and the ocean. Which is worse? The only real solution is to ban these forever chemicals entirely. As a stopgap measure, sewage processing could be enhanced to reduce these chemicals and drugs.

Danielle
Danielle
2 years ago

These are the guidelines for our State.
https://www.epa.sa.gov.au/files/14641_guide_biosolids.pdf