Economy

Four Reasons Civilization Won’t Decline: It Will Collapse

August 10, 2020

As modern civilization’s shelf life expires, more scholars have turned their attention to the decline and fall of civilizations past.  Their studies have generated rival explanations of why societies collapse and civilizations die.  Meanwhile, a lucrative market has emerged for post-apocalyptic novels, movies, TV shows, and video games for those who enjoy the vicarious thrill of dark, futuristic disaster and mayhem from the comfort of their cozy couch.  Of course, surviving the real thing will become a much different story.

The latent fear that civilization is living on borrowed time has also spawned a counter-market of “happily ever after” optimists who desperately cling to their belief in endless progress.  Popular Pollyannas, like cognitive psychologist Steven Pinker, provide this anxious crowd with soothing assurances that the titanic ship of progress is unsinkable.  Pinker’s publications have made him the high priest of progress.[1] While civilization circles the drain, his ardent audiences find comfort in lectures and books brimming with cherry-picked evidence to prove that life is better than ever, and will surely keep improving.  Yet, when questioned, Pinker himself admits, “It’s incorrect to extrapolate that the fact that we’ve made progress is a prediction that we’re guaranteed to make progress.”[2]

Pinker’s rosy statistics cleverly disguise the fatal flaw in his argument.  The progress of the past was built by sacrificing the future—and the future is upon us.  All the happy facts he cites about living standards, life expectancy, and economic growth are the product of an industrial civilization that has pillaged and polluted the planet to produce temporary progress for a growing middle class—and enormous profits and power for a tiny elite.

Not everyone who understands that progress has been purchased at the expense of the future thinks that civilization’s collapse will be abrupt and bitter.  Scholars of ancient societies, like Jared Diamond and John Michael Greer, accurately point out that abrupt collapse is a rare historical phenomenon.  In The Long Descent, Greer assures his readers that, “The same pattern repeats over and over again in history.  Gradual disintegration, not sudden catastrophic collapse, is the way civilizations end.”  Greer estimates that it takes, on average, about 250 years for civilizations to decline and fall, and he finds no reason why modern civilization shouldn’t follow this “usual timeline.”[3]

But Greer’s assumption is built on shaky ground because industrial civilization differs from all past civilizations in four crucial ways.  And every one of them may accelerate and intensify the coming collapse while increasing the difficulty of recovery.

[slide-anything id=’3472166′]

Difference #1:  Unlike all previous civilizations, modern industrial civilization is powered by an exceptionally rich, NON-renewable, and irreplaceable energy source—fossil fuels.  This unique energy base predisposes industrial civilization to a short, meteoric lifespan of unprecedented boom and drastic bust.  Megacities, globalized production, industrial agriculture, and a human population approaching 8 billion are all historically exceptional—and unsustainable—without fossil fuels.  Today, the rich easily exploited oilfields and coalmines of the past are mostly depleted.  And, while there are energy alternatives, there are no realistic replacements that can deliver the abundant net energy fossil fuels once provided.[4]  Our complex, expansive, high-speed civilization owes its brief lifespan to this one-time, rapidly dwindling energy bonanza.

Difference #2:  Unlike past civilizations, the economy of industrial society is capitalist.  Production for profit is its prime directive and driving force.  The unprecedented surplus energy supplied by fossil fuels has generated exceptional growth and enormous profits over the past two centuries.  But in the coming decades, these historic windfalls of abundant energy, constant growth, and rising profits will vanish.

However, unless it is abolished, capitalism will not disappear when boom turns to bust.  Instead, energy-starved, growth-less capitalism will turn catabolic.  Catabolismrefers to the condition whereby a living thing devours itself.  As profitable sources of production dry up, capitalism will be compelled to turn a profit by consuming the social assets it once created.  By cannibalizing itself, the profit motive will exacerbate industrial society’s dramatic decline.

Catabolic capitalism will profit from scarcity, crisis, disaster, and conflict.  Warfare, resource hoarding, ecological disaster, and pandemic diseases will become the big profit makers.  Capital will flow toward lucrative ventures like cybercrime, predatory lending, and financial fraud; bribery, corruption, and racketeering; weapons, drugs, and human trafficking.  Once disintegration and destruction become the primary source of profit, catabolic capitalism will rampage down the road to ruin, gorging itself on one self-inflicted disaster after another.[5]

Difference #3:  Unlike past societies, industrial civilization isn’t Roman, Chinese, Egyptian, Aztec, or Mayan.  Modern civilization is HUMAN, PLANETARY, and ECOCIDAL.  Pre-industrial civilizations depleted their topsoil, felled their forests, and polluted their rivers.  But the harm was far more temporary and geographically limited. Once market incentives harnessed the colossal power of fossil fuels to exploit nature, the dire results were planetary.  Two centuries of fossil fuel combustion have saturated the biosphere with climate-altering carbon that will continue wreaking havoc for generations to come.  The damage to Earth’s living systems—the circulation and chemical composition of the atmosphere and the ocean; the stability of the hydrological and biogeochemical cycles; and the biodiversity of the entire planet—is essentially permanent.

Humans have become the most invasive species ever known.  Although we are a mere .01 percent of the planet’s biomass, our domesticated crops and livestock dominate life on Earth.  In terms of total biomass, 96 percent of all the mammals on Earth are livestock; only 4 percent are wild mammals.  Seventy percent of all birds are domesticated poultry, only 30 percent are wild.  About half the Earth’s wild animals are thought to have been lost in just the last 50 years.[6]  Scientists estimate that half of all remaining species will be extinct by the end of the century.[7] There are no more unspoiled ecosystems or new frontiers where people can escape the damage they’ve caused and recover from collapse.

Difference #4:  Human civilization’s collective capacity to confront its mounting crises is crippled by a fragmented political system of antagonistic nations ruled by corrupt elites who care more about power and wealth than people and the planet.  Humanity faces a perfect storm of converging global calamities.  Intersecting tribulations like climate chaos, rampant extinction, food and freshwater scarcity, poverty, extreme inequality, and the rise of global pandemics are rapidly eroding the foundations of modern life.

Yet, this fractious and fractured political system makes organizing and mounting a cooperative response nearly impossible.  And, the more catabolic industrial capitalism becomes, the greater the danger that hostile rulers will fan the flames of nationalism and go to war over scarce resources.  Of course, warfare is not new.  But modern warfare is so devastating, destructive, and toxic that little would remain in its aftermath.  This would be the final nail in civilization’s coffin.

Rising From the Ruins?

How people respond to the collapse of industrial civilization will determine how bad things get and what will replace it. The challenges are monumental.  They will force us to question our identities, our values, and our loyalties like no other experience in our history.  Who are we?  Are we, first and foremost, human beings struggling to raise our families, strengthen our communities, and coexist with the other inhabitants of Earth?  Or do our primary loyalties belong to our nation, our culture, our race, our ideology, or our religion?  Can we put the survival of our species and our planet first, or will we allow ourselves to become hopelessly divided along national, cultural, racial, religious, or party lines?

The eventual outcome of this great implosion is up for grabs.  Will we overcome denial and despair; kick our addiction to petroleum; and pull together to break the grip of corporate power over our lives?  Can we foster genuine democracy, harness renewable energy, reweave our communities, re-learn forgotten skills, and heal the wounds we’ve inflicted on the Earth?  Or will fear and prejudice drive us into hostile camps, fighting over the dwindling resources of a degraded planet?  The stakes could not be higher.

Notes.

[1] His books include: The Better Angels of Our Nature and Enlightenment Now: The Case for Reason, Science, Humanism, and Progress.

[2] King, Darryn. “Steven Pinker on the Past, Present, and Future of Optimism” (OneZero, Jan 10, 2019) https://onezero.medium.com/steven-pinker-on-the-past-present-and-future-of-optimism-f362398c604b

[3] Greer, John Michael.  The Long Descent (New Society Publishers, 2008): 29.

[4] Heinberg, Richard. The End Of Growth. (New Society, 2011): 117.

[5] For more on catabolic capitalism see: Collins, Craig. “Catabolism: Capitalism’s Frightening Future,”CounterPunch (Nov. 1, 2018). https://www.counterpunch.org/2018/11/01/catabolism-capitalisms-frightening-future/

[6] Carrington, Damian. “New Study: Humans Just 0.01% Of All Life But Have Destroyed 83% Of Wild Mammals,” The Guardian (May 21, 2018). https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2018/may/21/human-race-just-001-of-all-life-but-has-destroyed-over-80-of-wild-mammals-study

[7] Ceballos, Ehrlich, Barnosky, Garcia, Pringle & Palmer. “Accelerated Modern Human-Induced Species Losses: Entering The 6th Mass Extinction,” Science Advances. (June 19, 2015). http://advances.sciencemag.org/content/1/5/e1400253

Teaser Photograph Source: Studio Incendo – https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/

Craig Collins

Craig Collins Ph.D. is the author of Toxic Loopholes, which examines America’s dysfunctional system of environmental protection and the international system’s failure to confront climate chaos. He teaches political science and environmental law at California State University East Bay and was a founding member of the Green Party of California. His forthcoming books: Marx & Mother Nature and Rising From the Ruins: Catabolic Capitalism & Green Resistance reformulate Marx’s theory of history & social change and examine the emerging struggle to replace catabolic capitalism with a thriving, just, ecologically resilient society.


Tags: building resilient societies, collapse of industrial civilization

Comments

Welcome to the new Resillience commenting system!

We have moved from the former Disqus commenting system to a new system as of September 10, 2026.

  • Your past comments have not disappeared.
  • You can log in with your old Disqus credentials, as well as Gmail credentials or a Resilience account (formerly Resilience+). Login with Facebook and other credentials is coming soon.

We made this change because of privacy concerns regarding Disqus. It's also part of a set of changes to bring more services to the Resilience community under a single login: commenting, (coming September 2026), and online courses (coming 2027). Unfortunately, your old Disqus comments may not reliably link to your account in this new system. Please contact us if you have any questions or concerns.

Subscribe
Notify of
15 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
DavidInSydney
DavidInSydney
4 years ago

What a strange article. What a strange discussion.

Gentle civilising mother capitalism is amazing.
In just 200 years capitalism has:
– lifted the poor, that’s us, out of grinding poverty.
– lifted women out of servitude & eliminated slavery.
– underpinned enormous advances in science, tech, medicine.

It works WITH human nature. It works. Modern civilisation is not going away even if there’s some catastrophe such as war with communist China. Just as we survived, actually thrived in the 20th century despite two destructive wars and the threat to civilisation from the Soviet empire.

Just on one point commonly made in this forum, running out of fossil fuels, what arrant nonsense, yet it gets constantly repeated.

comment image

GHook93
GHook93
2 years ago

What a stupid article. Fossil fuels are still abundant and when they are not CAPITALISM will lead to another source.

Capitalism has lead to the growth in advancement in our society and innovation. It has lead more people out of poverty then any other system. Capitalism is our strength not weakness!

Mike Roberts
1 year ago
Reply to  GHook93

The good stuff, crude oil and condensates, peaked in November 2018. Discoveries have lagged production for decades. But fossil fuels are not the only non-renewable resource that this civilisation consumes. 300 years seems incredibly optimistic. I hope you're right but have no basis for that hope. All civilisations are unsustainable and, eventually, this one will fail, as all others have.

GHook93
GHook93
1 year ago
Reply to  Mike Roberts

What a lie. Oil is not even close to peaking. I remember I was told that in Jr High that it would peak in the mid-90s. Low and behold it hasn’t peaked nearly 30 yrs later.

Bart_at_EB
Bart_at_EB
1 year ago
Reply to  GHook93

Last I heard, conventional oil peaked several years ago.
Fracking changed the numbers for a while.

Tony Weddle
Tony Weddle
9 months ago

Not a lie. At the time, the data showed crude+condensate production peaked in 2018. However, just recently, that figure was bested in July. Regardless, it's been on an undulating plateau for 7 years. Just because some past predictions of peak were wrong doesn't mean that oil is an inexhaustible supply. As Bart mentioned, conventional oil (that's the easy to get stuff) peaked about 20 years ago. We're now in the harder to get (meaning less net energy) oil to keep production on that plateau. Peak is inevitable but the timing is unknown, though it doesn't seem too far away, given the data.

GHook93
GHook93
9 months ago
Reply to  Tony Weddle

Oil as a whole is at least a century away from peaking!

James O'Connell
James O'Connell
2 years ago

There is no mention of nuclear energy as a way of replacing dependence on fossil fuels. Also, Fusion is an even more palatable alternative, still in its infancy but a likely future technology.
Capitalism has also been closely linked, historically, to the rule of law and the growth of democracy.

interventor
interventor
2 years ago

Collapse in US will come if the Democrats keep on their neo-confederacy program from the west coast. Or, succumb to the new antisemitic/fascist movement now in vogue.

GravityForTheMasses
GravityForTheMasses
3 years ago

Thugs don’t ask what kind of societal organization people want. Thugs come in and terrorize, exploit and enslave for their own prurient sadistic glee that they derive from inflicting terror, death and despair of the meek. Humans tend to adore the most demonic and perverted of sadists and consider the most perverted and demonic of evildoers to be the tribe’s alpha. Every problem we suffer these days is because ethical apes refused to stop the trash apes’ reigns of terror. Most humans would rather worship Hitler than to suffer to listen to one of Hitler’s victims ask for help. Most humans derive a perverse joy on seeing their fellow man terrorized and suffering especially if their fellow man is a helpless child or at some disadvantage. It’s why Putin and Ghislaine Maxwell peddle child flesh to old elitist perverts while society does nothing. Trash Ape-kind allows its worst actors infinite prurience and infinite impunity. There will be a price to pay a lack of justice and a lack of moral hygiene. And that price is extinction.

simmerjet
simmerjet
3 years ago

The fact that you are calling plant based petroleum deposits ” Fossil” Fuel proves ignorance. Petroleum comes from the natural decomposition of plant matter. Not dinosaurs. Petroleum is not finite as most people think, as it is part of the life cycle of the earth. The rest of your article is a bit suspect as well. Capitalism has been around since the dawn of civilized man in one form or another. So perhaps you are referring to the relatively short life of modern capitalism?. You point to the extinction of animals, yet you ignore the creation of new organisms , Perhaps because they do not develop quickly enough for you?.. Its this sort of shortsightedness that people cling too, because they can’t see past their own definitions of what is and is not..We humans will not collapse, we will evolve into something other than blood,bone and tissue, We have nothing but time to prove this

NewYorkBaby80
NewYorkBaby80
3 years ago

People in U.S are robbing people in the streets with guns and violently using the guns to destroy peoples lives. People do not work in U.S as many are on welfare. The deficit spending in U.S is out of control and without making drastic structural changes it will exponentially increase. Healthcare remains a problem as there are not enough trained personnel to handle the amount of people who are sick, to care for them, evaluate their malady and help them recover. Countries are acting out more aggressively and threatening to use mass destructive weapons against other countries. In reality I am surprised the U.S has lasted this long. I am trying to find a place to build an ARK

archeon
archeon
4 years ago

Homo Sapiens have occupied the Southern Tip of Africa for at least 300,000 years, or about 15,000 generations.
It has been 16 generations since we started our World Wide Experiment With Science.
Science is the Pandora’s box the ancients warned us about.

sandy
sandy
4 years ago

Romes elites had a massive army as an organizing vehicle and conquest as their monetary goal…These older societies were based on ‘tribute’ as the return on their military investment…This was not “capitalist” because it was military force not capital that drove the expansion….and in regard your comment “A fossil-fuelled empire doesn’t care about land area, it cares about what’s under that land.
” I am not sure I agree with that, it cares little for anything other than profit…and the profit is gained by taking global resources and turning them into control and power…a capitalist doesn’t care where the profit comes from specifically…. air, water, land below surface resources and more and more human resources…it is all one in the same to Capital ’cause Capital has no ethics and no conscience

Ralph Dratman
Ralph Dratman
4 years ago

“The damage to Earth’s living systems … is essentially permanent.”
Ah, but that annoying word “essentially”… what does it mean?
Will this essentially permanent damage revert after 1,000 years?
100,000 years? 10 million years?
We cannot know.
But… if a person could have faith in only one single idea, for me it might be this: before 100 million more years have elapsed, intelligent life will once again make its home on our planet.