Peak phosphorus – the bottom line

August 20, 2007

Dear Master Gardeners,

Some MGs might find interesting an article that I’ve just co-written on “Peak Phosphorus” and what it means for agriculture.
energybulletin.net/33164.html

Also at The Oil Drum (which has 102 comments)
www.theoildrum.com/node/2882

Background reading (may be easier to start with):
energybulletin.net/28720.html

As we know from our MG training, phosphorus is one of the three macro-nutrients required by plants. Farmers (both organic and non-organic) use the phosphorus from rock phosphates as fertilizer to replenish the amount used up by crops.

The main points of the article are widely accepted:

  • Phosphates suitable for mining are limited.

  • Modern agriculture needs large amounts of phosphorus to raise enough food for the world population.
  • World demand for phosphorus has grown dramatically during the past decades and shows no sign of declining.
  • There is no substitute for phosphorus.
  • Phosphate production will probably follow a bell-shaped curve, with the most accessible deposits mined first.
  • We currently waste a heck of a lot of phosphorus.

What is new and controversial in the article is the assertion that we have passed the point of “Peak phosphorus” – the point of maximum production and consumption of phosphorus. This would mean that over time phosphorus will become more difficult to obtain, and more expensive. This would be a major problem for society, since without sufficient supplies of phosphorus we will have difficulty feeding ourselves.

My co-author Patrick Déry came to the conclusion that we have passed peak phosphorus by running statistical analyses on data from the US Geological Survey (estimates of phosphate reserves and production). The specific dates for peak phosphorus are what are controversial. The fact that we will run out of phospate deposits is not in dispute. At some point, we will inevitably face a phosphorus problem.

Bottom line for Master Gardeners:

  • Growing food will become much more important than it is now. Our skills and knowledge will be in even greater demand.

  • Recycling nutrients, e.g. through composting, will become more important. Expect to hear more about schemes like “urine diversion” and “humanure.” .
  • If I remember correctly, we in Santa Clara are blessed with soils that are abundant in phosphorus. Perhaps an MG expert can verify.

Bart Anderson

Bart Anderson lives in a small condominium in the San Francisco Bay Area. Since retiring in 2002, he spends most of his time monitoring and writing about peak oil, climate change and sustainability. As energy issues have grown in prominence, he’s had to cut back on his gardening and work in Master Gardeners, as well as the natural history and outdoor activities that he loves. In his previous lives, he was a technical writer for Hewlett-Packard (computer diagnostics and repair), a high school teacher, and a newspaper reporter/editor. He is active in a nascent Transition Palo Alto.


Tags: Culture & Behavior, Food, Overshoot, Resource Depletion

Comments

Welcome to the new Resillience commenting system!

We have moved from the former Disqus commenting system to a new system as of September 10, 2026.

  • Your past comments have not disappeared.
  • You can log in with your old Disqus credentials, as well as Gmail credentials or a Resilience account (formerly Resilience+). Login with Facebook and other credentials is coming soon.

We made this change because of privacy concerns regarding Disqus. It's also part of a set of changes to bring more services to the Resilience community under a single login: commenting, (coming September 2026), and online courses (coming 2027). Unfortunately, your old Disqus comments may not reliably link to your account in this new system. Please contact us if you have any questions or concerns.

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted