Russia Says ‘No’ to Nuclear Fusion Plant in Japan

January 15, 2004

MOSCOW – Russia on Thursday declined Japanese pleas to back Tokyo’s bid to host a disputed nuclear fusion reactor as the global contest for the multi-billion project threatened to hurt relations among the participants.

Japan and France are vying for the right to build the world’s first such reactor, but the six members of the joint venture have so far failed to agree on the site. The plant would generate energy the same way the sun does.

Russia and China favor the French site of Cadarache. South Korea and the United States — in a move seen in Paris as a bid to punish it for opposing the U.S.-led war in Iraq — back Japan’s fishing village of Rokkasho. Japanese Science Minister Takeo Kawamura was in Moscow on Thursday for closed-door talks with Russia’s nuclear top brass, but was given a firm ‘no’ mixed with diplomatic politeness from the Russian side, a source in Russia’s Atomic Energy Ministry said. “Our position is clear. They haven’t been able to convince us, although we were really nice to them today,” the source told Reuters after talks between Kawamura and Russian Atomic Energy Minister Alexander Rumyantsev. “The French site is cheaper and thus more acceptable.”

The decision on the $12 billion project, due to be taken by consensus among the participants of the International Thermonuclear Experimental Reactor (ITER), has been postponed until February. Russia’s staunch refusal could undermine the recently warming relations between Moscow and Tokyo. The two countries remain technically at war, with Russia refusing Japan’s demand to return four small islands in the Far East seized in the final days of World War II. Nuclear fusion has been touted as a solution to the world’s energy problems, as it would be low in pollution and could theoretically use seawater as fuel.

Fusion involves sticking atomic particles together as opposed to existing nuclear reactors and weapons which produce energy by splitting atoms apart. Fifty years of research have so far failed to produce a commercially viable fusion reactor.


Tags: Electricity, Nuclear, Technology

Comments

Welcome to the new Resillience commenting system!

We have moved from the former Disqus commenting system to a new system as of September 10, 2026.

  • Your past comments have not disappeared.
  • You can log in with your old Disqus credentials, as well as Gmail credentials or a Resilience account (formerly Resilience+). Login with Facebook and other credentials is coming soon.

We made this change because of privacy concerns regarding Disqus. It's also part of a set of changes to bring more services to the Resilience community under a single login: commenting, (coming September 2026), and online courses (coming 2027). Unfortunately, your old Disqus comments may not reliably link to your account in this new system. Please contact us if you have any questions or concerns.

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted