Polar bears on parade

February 8, 2007

NOTE: Images in this archived article have been removed.

Are polar bears going to save the planet from global warming?

Today was an energy trifecta in the U.S. Senate: you could see Energy Secretary Samuel Bodman testifying on the energy sections of the President’s new budget, find out about the Bush administration’s political manipulations of climate science, or talk about global warming and wildlife.

Charismatic mega fauna (CM) fan that I am, I headed for the wildlife hearings, held by the (who makes up these names?) Private Sector and Consumer Solutions to Global Warming and Wildlife Protection subcommittee of the Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee, chaired by Senator Joe Lieberman.

Image Removed …Senator Inhofe was up next, and he was having no part of any hand wringing about cute polar bears or anything else: “Animals are fun and fuzzy and I love them, but they can be used to advance another agenda.” He claimed that environmentalists were using love for wildlife to seek “political changes they can’t get through science alone… [Environmentalists want to] “shut down development” across the U.S.

…However, the expert witnesses before the subcommittee did not join in Senator Inhofe’s furious attacks on the science behind global warming, largely contradicting everything Inhofe had just said. Dr. Brendan Kelly, who has worked with Inuit hunters for much of his career, said that the summer ice cover in the Arctic had decreased 26% in his career.

…As to whether climate change was happening or not, Dr. Thomas E. Lovejoy, one of the country’s most distinguished ecological scientists, talked about how the evidence for climate change had shifted from the anecdotal evidence he cited in his first book to “signals in nature” that were unrebuttable: changes in the times of flowering, migrations, nest building, and egg laying. Because every species would respond to climate change at its own rate, ecological communities would start to “disassemble,” as mismatches occurred between, say, caterpillars and the availability of the plants they eat.

Lovejoy said that most prominent system change to date was the increasing acidity of the oceans as they absorbed some of the excess carbon dioxide. The oceans are now 30% more acidic than they were in pre-industrial times. “Two-thirds of the earth’s surface is changing its chemistry,” Lovejoy said. …

The complete article is at Global Public Media.


Tags: Politics

Comments

Welcome to the new Resillience commenting system!

We have moved from the former Disqus commenting system to a new system as of September 10, 2026.

  • Your past comments have not disappeared.
  • You can log in with your old Disqus credentials, as well as Gmail credentials or a Resilience account (formerly Resilience+). Login with Facebook and other credentials is coming soon.

We made this change because of privacy concerns regarding Disqus. It's also part of a set of changes to bring more services to the Resilience community under a single login: commenting, (coming September 2026), and online courses (coming 2027). Unfortunately, your old Disqus comments may not reliably link to your account in this new system. Please contact us if you have any questions or concerns.

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted