Building a world of
resilient communities.



What you're telling us

Thanks to all the readers (1470 of you!) who recently completed our survey. The results have been very useful in getting a better picture of how readers are using, and how the structure is working.  It has been very helpful to read your specific feedback, so thanks for all comments – the praise, the suggestions, and the criticism. All are essential to keep us on our toes.

Here is a summary of what we learned:

• You come to us for information, and 85% of you feel informed, motivated, and/or inspired as a result of reading
• You’re looking for interesting, reliable content. There is an even split between wanting more information on the issues, and wanting information on responses to these issues. The important thing is that it is strong content.
• Only 1.7% of you are confused by the site.
• Although 3% are depressed, this is mostly due to the state of the world, not the state of the site.
• Of respondents who visited the’s predecessor (Energy Bulletin) 83% find the content on either more comprehensive, more useful or about the same, compared to the old site. There were a good number of comments from readers who still miss the look and layout of Energy Bulletin.
• New users have gathered since we launched 30% of respondents had not previously visited to Energy Bulletin.
• Only a minority of respondents had so far found their way to the Groups and Resources sections of the site. On balance, respondents found the Resources section more useful than the Groups.
• It was great to see that 40% of you are involved in community resilience building, with an additional 20% wishing for such a group in your area.
• We were also excited to find that 33% of respondents had been inspired to take action as a result of reading
• Just under half of respondents share content via social media or email. Where you do share, Facebook is the most popular method, although much of the sharing goes on via direct personal recommendations in email.
Thanks again for the many comments, which are much more difficult to summarize. Be assured that all the editors and advisors have read and discussed all of the findings, including the comments and will consider them as we evolve the site. We hope you will continue to follow
The editors
Feedback image via shutterstock. Reproduced at with permission

What do you think? Leave a comment below.

Sign up for regular Resilience bulletins direct to your email.

Take action!  

Find out more about Community Resilience. See our COMMUNITIES page
Start your own projects. See our RESOURCES page.
Help build resilience. DONATE NOW.


This is a community site and the discussion is moderated. The rules in brief: no personal abuse and no climate denial. Complete Guidelines.


Buying Local Is the Key to Strong Regional Economies

In the leaky bucket analogy for local economies, money flows into a region …

Inside the Little Free Pantry

Created by Jessica McClard, the Pantry is an easy way for people to share …

Globalization and the American Dream

Implicit in the rhetoric promoting globalization is the premise that the …

In Praise of the Reprehensible

Between the political correctness of the left and the patriotic correctness …

Trama: Netweaving and Collaboration in Rio de Janeiro

In late 2014 a design project at PUC-Rio university led five students to the …

If Facts Don’t Matter, What Does?

I first began reading the works of linguist and cognitive scientist George …

History as a Commons

We spoke about the importance of looking at the social, political and …