Society

How to Think About the Future – Part 1: Changing the future starts with how you think

April 28, 2026

 

Recorded on Apr 11, 2026 | In this week’s Frankly, Nate opens a new series called How to Think About the Future. He begins with some comments he’s heard repeatedly on this platform: why cover nuclear, plastics, renewables, or climate when something else is the real issue? Nate observes that these questions come from people who have already settled on a single storyline about what’s coming, and are filtering everything else through it. Our actual reality is much more complex and unknowable, and even the most well-informed perspectives may only be able to capture pieces of the bigger picture. Nate emphasizes that even his own base scenario – that the global economy is likely to hit a wall in the relatively-near future – should be held with humility.

Nate introduces the idea of “scenario thinking” as a practical strategy to reflect on and prepare for several versions of the future, keeping one engaged and grounded in what matters. He also names why this line of thinking is hard in practice – 1. our nervous systems want resolution, 2. our careers and identities are attached to particular futures, and 3. cultural incentives reward confident stories over honest uncertainty. The episode closes by introducing shortfall risk, which is the danger that something essential, like topsoil, social trust, grid stability, or the nuclear taboo drops below a threshold from which it cannot easily recover. This concept will act as connective tissue across the rest of the series, which is an attempt to expand perception instead of picking the right future, and to identify what is coupled, what is irreversible, and what kinds of responses stay robust across many possible worlds.

Where in your life have you quietly settled on a single story about the future? Which of the essentials you rely on would be hardest to rebuild if they fell below a threshold? And how might the decisions you make this week change if you held more than one plausible future in mind at the same time?

 Download transcript

The TGS team puts together these brief references and show notes for the learning and convenience of our listeners. However, most of the points made in episodes hold more nuance than one link can address, and we encourage you to dig deeper into any of these topics and come to your own informed conclusions.

00:30 – The Great Simplification

00:55 – More-than-human predicament

01:30 – Renewables are better termed “Rebuildables”

01:35 – Climate is* in the top 10 risks that people are worried about

03:03 – Narrative as active inferenceNarrative as reducing cognitive effort

04:00 – The likelihood of an upcoming global recessionRecession vs. Depression

05:45 – Scenario planningHow to do scenario analysisScenario Thinking: A Historical Evolution of Strategic Foresight

06:00 – Frankly #129: A Guide to Staying Human (Part 1): Desperately Seeking Agency

06:50 – The predicament is much bigger than one person can see alone

07:00 – Overconfidence effect

08:12 – Frankly #132: What to Do as the World Falls Apart: A Framework for Action

09:00 – Shortfall risk

09:35 – Iran War 2026

09:40 – Complex systems thinkingComplexity and Postmodernism by Paul Cilliers

10:57 – Hormuz situation (In-video mapIn-video graph): Fertilizer issue (In-video graph), Food security threatPolitical legitimacy threatFinancial reset

11:50 – The Oil Drum blog

12:30 – Complex systems move in fits and starts

13:20 – Ecological phase shifts and path dependency

14:30 – Global Tipping Points Report 2025Tipping pointsIce sheetsSoil systems

15:05 – Non-linear causalityFeedback loops

19:30 – The Danger of Single Story Thinking

19:45 – The metabolic cost of thinking and cognitionATPHow the brain burns calories

20:20 – Questioning one’s beliefs feels threateningEgo development and how to manage such threats

22:00 – Role of religionTerror Management Theory (More info) (TGS episode on such)

22:25 – Iain McGilchrist, TGS Episodes: #165#85

26:00 – What would happen if we lost our top soil or fully depleted an aquifer?

26:20 – Nuclear use taboo decreasing and nuclear proliferation (Iran situation), 

The Inherent Unpredictability of Nuclear Deterrence 

28:10 – Portfolio management in finance

28:42 – Oil 101-301 Frankly Series


Join us online on May 6, 2026, for a live panel discussion with Nate Hagens: “Chokepoint: The New Urgency of Ending Our Fossil Fuel Addiction.” Reserve your spot by registering today.

Nate Hagens

Nate Hagens

Nate Hagens is the Director of The Institute for the Study of Energy & Our Future (ISEOF) an organization focused on educating and preparing society for the coming cultural transition. Allied with leading ecologists, energy experts, politicians and systems thinkers ISEOF assembles road-maps and off-ramps for how human societies can adapt to lower throughput lifestyles.

Nate holds a Masters Degree in Finance with Honors from the University of Chicago and a Ph.D. in Natural Resources from the University of Vermont. He teaches an Honors course, Reality 101, at the University of Minnesota.


Tags: psychology, resilience, Worldview