Energy featured

Will We Artificially Cool the Planet? The Science and Politics of Geoengineering

November 12, 2025

Recorded on: Sep 25, 2025

Description

The severity of the climate crisis continues to deepen, despite the increased use of renewable energy sources and international policies attempting otherwise. Even as emissions reduction efforts continue, our world faces more extreme weather, sea level rise, and human health impacts, all of which are projected to accelerate in the coming decades. This raises an important but controversial question: at what point might more drastic interventions, like geoengineering, become necessary in order to cool the planet?

In this episode, Nate interviews Professor Ted Parson about solar geoengineering (specifically stratospheric aerosol injection) as a potential response to severe climate risks. They explore why humanity may need to consider deliberately cooling Earth by spraying reflective particles in the upper atmosphere, how the technology would work, as well as the risks and enormous governance challenges involved. Ted emphasizes the importance of having these difficult conversations now, so that we’re prepared for the wide range of climate possibilities in the future.

How does stratospheric aerosol injection actually work? What is the likelihood that a major nation (or rogue billionaire) might employ this approach in the next thirty years? What ethical, moral, and biophysical concerns should we consider as we weigh the costs and benefits of further altering Earth’s planetary balance?

About Ted Parson

Edward A. (Ted) Parson is Dan and Rae Emmett Professor of Environmental Law and Faculty Director of the Emmett Institute on Climate Change and the Environment at the University of California, Los Angeles. Parson studies international environmental law and policy, the societal impacts and governance of disruptive technologies including geoengineering and artificial intelligence, and the political economy of regulation.

His most recent books are The Science and Politics of Global Climate Change (with Andrew Dessler), and A Subtle Balance: Evidence, Expertise, and Democracy in Public Policy and Governance, 1970-2010. His 2003 book, Protecting the Ozone Layer: Science and Strategy, won the Sprout Award of the International Studies Association and is widely recognized as the authoritative account of the development of international cooperation to protect the ozone layer.

In addition to his academic positions, Parson has worked and consulted for the White House Office of Science and Technology Policy, the Office of Technology Assessment of the U.S. Congress, the Privy Council Office of the Government of Canada, and the International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis (IIASA).

Show Notes & Links to Learn More

Download transcript

The TGS team puts together these brief references and show notes for the learning and convenience of our listeners. However, most of the points made in episodes hold more nuance than one link can address, and we encourage you to dig deeper into any of these topics and come to your own informed conclusions.

00:00 – Ted Parson info + works

00:59 – Emmett Institute on Climate Change and the Environment 

04:08 – Millions of people die each year from inaction on global heating

04:23 – June 2024 marked one year of global temperatures at 1.5ºC above pre-industrial temperatures

04:45 – Wood Mackenzie’s 2 – 3.1ºC outlooks for the energy transition

05:16 – International Energy Agency: “The world now invests almost twice as much in clean energy as it does in fossil fuels…”

05:34 – The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change: Global greenhouse gas emissions must be reduced 43% by 2030

06:18 – Extreme flooding in PakistanHeatwaves in India

06:58 – Precipitation extremes at 1.5ºC warming

07:20 – Richter scale

08:00 – Heat wave effects on human health and productivity

08:36 – Negative emissions

09:35 – Geoengineering

09:45 – The Blue Marble photograph

10:19 – White roofs to help with solar reflectivityForests, snow cover, and albedo

11:30 – Urban heat island effect

12:09 – Dark urban surfaces absorb more heat

12:18 – Thermal absorption of brick

12:54 – Extreme heat is a threat in rural areas

13:09 – Changes in U.S. seasonal temperatures 

14:30 – Marine cloud brightening

15:13 – Space sunshade 

15:33 – The Police – King of Pain

16:49 – Stratospheric Aerosol Injection

17:25 – Where air pollution comes from

17:43 – Acid rainTropospheric ozone pollutionHealth problems due to fine particulates

17:58 – Atmospheric sulfur cooling the planet

18:47 – Volcanic effects on climate changeThe sulfur cycle

19:29 – Mount Pinatubo eruption and its effect on global climate

19:48 – Post-eruption cooling effect

20:05 – Aerosols in nature

21:15 – Lifetime of pollutants in the troposphere

21:27 – Stratospheric residence time

22:34 – 2025 Congressional subcommittee on transparency regarding government weather and climate engineering 

22:44 – NOAA weather modification project reports

24:14 – Edward Parson and David W. Keith – Solar Geoengineering: History, Methods, Governance, Prospects

25:08 – 1997* study on stratospheric aerosol injection

25:56 – Bala Govindasamy and Ken Caldeira – Geoengineering Earth’s radiation balance to mitigate CO2-induced climate change

27:48 – Geoengineering can restore surface temperature for >90% of the Earth’s area

28:00 – Anthony Harding, et al, – Impact of solar geoengineering on temperature-attributable mortality

28:24 – Solar geoengineering could impact ozone chemistrycreate acid rain

29:55 – Ted Parson, et al. – Evaluating the efficacy and equity of environmental stopgap measures

30:11 – Injecting 12 million tons of sulfur dioxide per year would cool the planet by around 0.6°C

31:52 – Optimal injection locations, rates, and heights

34:40 – Costs of stratospheric aerosol injection

35:28 – Limitations on existing jet engine types needed for this operation

36:03 – David Victor “Greenfinger” scenario

36:31 – Joshua B. Horton, et al. – Who Could Deploy Stratospheric Aerosol Injection? The United States, China, and Large-Scale, Rapid Planetary Cooling

42:26 – Injecting sulfur dioxide at multiple latitudes allows some tailoring of the resulting climate response

42:52 – Reverse colonization claims about stratospheric sulfur injection

44:54 – Who Owns the World’s Fossil Fuels?

45:19 – Moral hazard

46:07 – Termination shock

49:38 – Edward Parson and Holly Buck – Large-Scale Carbon Dioxide Removal: The Problem of Phasedown

53:12 – EU call for temporary ban on solar geoengineering technologies, climate vulnerable nations reject U.S.-led push for solar geoengineering

53:34 – Global initiative for non-use agreement regarding solar geoengineering

57:55 – Kim Stanley Robinson – The Ministry for the FutureTGS Episode

1:00:35 – Edward Parson and Jesse Reynolds – Solar geoengineering: Scenarios of future governance challenges

1:02:33 – Planetary boundaries

1:02:37 – Failure to adopt emissions reductions from Paris Climate Agreementfailure to deliver on climate adaptation funds

1:03:56 – Edward Parson – Protecting the Ozone Layer: Science and Strategy

1:04:01 – Edward Parson – The Montreal Protocol: The First Adaptive Global Environmental Regime? 

1:08:20 – Research involving alternatives to sulfate aerosolsrisks posed by stratospheric aerosol injection

1:10:08 – Global sulfur dioxide emissions 1750-2022

1:10:17 – IMO limit on sulphur content in ship fuel

1:10:24 – Leon Simons on TGSPaper on Impact of Declining Aerosol Emissions on Climate

1:10:44 – Zeke Hausfather and David Keith – Turns Out Air Pollution Was Good for Something

1:11:48 – Extreme fires in Spain and California this year, Mediterranean and Western Europe heat extremes

1:12:44 – Joshua B. Horton and David W. Keith – Multilateral parametric climate risk insurance: a tool to facilitate agreement about deployment of solar geoengineering?

1:17:30 – Degrees Global Forum meeting in South Africa

Nate Hagens

Nate Hagens

Nate Hagens is the Director of The Institute for the Study of Energy & Our Future (ISEOF) an organization focused on educating and preparing society for the coming cultural transition. Allied with leading ecologists, energy experts, politicians and systems thinkers ISEOF assembles road-maps and off-ramps for how human societies can adapt to lower throughput lifestyles.

Nate holds a Masters Degree in Finance with Honors from the University of Chicago and a Ph.D. in Natural Resources from the University of Vermont. He teaches an Honors course, Reality 101, at the University of Minnesota.

Comments

Welcome to the new Resillience commenting system!

We have moved from the former Disqus commenting system to a new system as of September 10, 2026.

  • Your past comments have not disappeared.
  • You can log in with your old Disqus credentials, as well as Gmail credentials or a Resilience account (formerly Resilience+). Login with Facebook and other credentials is coming soon.

We made this change because of privacy concerns regarding Disqus. It's also part of a set of changes to bring more services to the Resilience community under a single login: commenting, (coming September 2026), and online courses (coming 2027). Unfortunately, your old Disqus comments may not reliably link to your account in this new system. Please contact us if you have any questions or concerns.

Subscribe
Notify of
1 Comment
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
PattiMichelle Sheaffer
PattiMichelle Sheaffer
9 months ago

Aaaaa… you can calculate the energy needed to do that with actionable precision. Yes, as long as we can burn the necessary fossil fuels, but in the Real World, those will all be diverted to making the Affluent moreso. There's no profit (in the usual sense of the word) in fixing this…

I wish Lester Brown were available to stat us on the global food situation. I suspect things have gotten much worse than this… and that our current food status in the US has also become a fantasy of wealth, so to speak, and everyone, including the (scientists and staff) need food and the associated fantasy of wealth, to remain functionally motivated. Lester Brown pointed out that foodless days were becoming a global norm for many back in 2012… what about now and the future? Can we maintain our high-tech fantasy in the face of hunger being a Western norm? When does it become "common knowledge" that this cannot work?
_________________ https://youtu.be/KPfUqEj5mok ________________________
Maybe invest in Prozac For The Elites?