Environment featured

“On the brink of an irreversible climate disaster”

October 31, 2024

Scientists have issued yet another clarion call regarding our seemingly unstoppable momentum toward climate catastrophe. In a recent article, The 2024 state of the climate report: Perilous times on planet Earth, some of the world’s leading climate scientists lay it out.

“We are on the brink of an irreversible climate disaster. This is a global emergency beyond any doubt. Much of the very fabric of life on Earth is imperiled. We are stepping into a critical and unpredictable new phase of the climate crisis . . . For half a century, global warming has been correctly predicted even before it was observed—and not only by independent academic scientists but also by fossil fuel companies.

“Despite these warnings, we are still moving in the wrong direction; fossil fuel emissions have increased to an all-time high, the 3 hottest days ever occurred in July of 2024, and current policies have us on track for approximately 2.7 degrees Celsius peak warming by 2100.

“Tragically, we are failing to avoid serious impacts, and we can now only hope to limit the extent of the damage. We are witnessing the grim reality of the forecasts as climate impacts escalate, bringing forth scenes of unprecedented disasters around the world and human and nonhuman suffering. We find ourselves amid an abrupt climate upheaval, a dire situation never before encountered in the annals of human existence. We have now brought the planet into climatic conditions never witnessed by us or our prehistoric relatives within our genus . . . “

Just how out of whack things are is depicted in one of the article’s graphics, which shows key climate metrics hitting levels way out of the historic record:

Credit: Ripple et al, 2024.

The scientists spell out the gory details, illustrating our global wrong way direction.

“Fossil fuel consumption rose by 1.5% in 2023 relative to 2022, mostly because of substantial increases in coal consumption (1.6%) and oil consumption (2.5%).”

“Global tree cover loss rose from 22.8 megahectares (Mha) per year in 2022 to 28.3 Mha per year in 2023, reaching its third-highest level; this was at least partly because of wildfires, which caused tree cover loss to reach a record high of 11.9 Mha.”

“Annual energy-related emissions increased 2.1% in 2023, and are now above 40 gigatons of carbon-dioxide-equivalent for the first time  . . .  the concentrations of carbon dioxide and methane are at record highs. . . Carbon dioxide levels were recently observed to be surging . . . Furthermore, the growth rate of methane emissions has been accelerating, which is very troubling . . . Nitrous oxide is also at a record high; annual anthropogenic emissions of this potent long-lived greenhouse gas have increased by roughly 40% from 1980 to 2020.”

“Surface temperature is at a record high, and 2024 is expected to be one of the hottest years ever recorded. Each 0.1°C of global warming places an extra 100 million people (or more) into unprecedented hot average temperatures.”

To the credit of this group, led by William Ripple of Oregon State University, they place the situation in the overall context of ecological overshoot.

“Global heating, although it is catastrophic, is merely one aspect of a profound polycrisis that includes environmental degradation, rising economic inequality, and biodiversity loss. Climate change is a glaring symptom of a deeper systemic issue: ecological overshoot, where human consumption outpaces the Earth’s ability to regenerate. Overshoot is an inherently unstable state that cannot persist indefinitely. As pressures increase and the risk of Earth’s climate system switching to a catastrophic state rises. more and more scientists have begun to research the possibility of societal collapse.”

“In a world with finite resources, unlimited growth is a perilous illusion. We need bold, transformative change: drastically reducing overconsumption and waste, especially by the affluent, stabilizing and gradually reducing the human population through empowering education and rights for girls and women, reforming food production systems to support more plant-based eating, and adopting an ecological and post-growth economics framework that ensures social justice.”

Will the world listen? Has it listened to decades of such clarion calls? A new United Nations report assesses climate plans of the world’s nations. UN Climate Change Executive Secretary Simon Stiell states,

”The report’s findings are stark but not surprising – current national climate plans fall miles short of what’s needed to stop global heating from crippling every economy, and wrecking billions of lives and livelihoods across every country.”

Even if all plans are fully implemented, a highly uncertain proposition, climate pollution would only be reduced 2.6% from 2019 levels by 2030, compared to the 43% needed to hold global heating below 1.5°C, a limit beyond which climate disruption sharply accelerates.

The world is clearly not getting it.

I will follow up with my reflections as a long-term climate activist and writer, stating what I think we can do, facing such a dire situation.

Patrick Mazza

Progressive activist and journalist since 1981. Lived in Seattle since 1998, and the Pacific Northwest, aka Cascadia, since 1977.

Comments

Welcome to the new Resillience commenting system!

We have moved from the former Disqus commenting system to a new system as of September 10, 2026.

  • Your past comments have not disappeared.
  • You can log in with your old Disqus credentials, as well as Gmail credentials or a Resilience account (formerly Resilience+). Login with Facebook and other credentials is coming soon.

We made this change because of privacy concerns regarding Disqus. It's also part of a set of changes to bring more services to the Resilience community under a single login: commenting, (coming September 2026), and online courses (coming 2027). Unfortunately, your old Disqus comments may not reliably link to your account in this new system. Please contact us if you have any questions or concerns.

Subscribe
Notify of
8 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Joe Clarkson
Joe Clarkson
1 year ago

Just more evidence that only an immediate and rapid collapse of industrial civilization will turn numerous horrific trends in the right direction. Of course, depopulation will be one trend that, while going in the right direction from collapse, will be "uncomfortable" for many.

Gary's Shrink
Gary's Shrink
1 year ago
Reply to  Joe Clarkson

Unfortunately, that does look like the most favorable outcome. It's sort of like the sad-sack football team that needs to totally crash and burn in order to get the draft picks it needs to become a contender. Maybe a poor analogy but that's where we are. The environment is ranked something like 15th on American's list of priorities, and dealing with climate change 18th, if you believe the polls. So, why would politicians even care if the public doesn't.

https://www.pewresearch.org/politics/2024/02/29/americans-top-policy-priority-for-2024-strengthening-the-economy/

Eclipse Now
1 year ago
Reply to  Gary's Shrink

If I lived in America, I'd probably agree at this point! But I've glimpsed some of the exponential trends – and am excited that we can turn this around – exponentially.

HOPE: The Energy Transition tech is here – and getting cheaper all the time. China is scaling up "Big Battery" to take on Big Oil. Renewable energy from vast and abundant renewable materials is happening. (Most of the ‘critical minerals’ are not needed – and even copper can be replaced by aluminium for 90% of industrial functions. Aluminium is 8% of the earth’s crust!) New food tech can eventually replace much livestock grazing, returning billions of hectares back to nature. (EG: Protein from giant seaweed farms – or even bacteria in Precision Fermentation.) Young people in my area are keen on various Ecocity and Solarpunk ideas.

JOIN SOMETHING: I know life is busy, but as well as reading globally about all these trends – some quite negative – I challenge the environmentally aware to do 2 things:-
A: donate to at least one large international organisation.
B: get involved with one local environmental cause. Think global, act local.
Is there something you or your family and friends could do together? Is there some local nature reserve or threatened species program you could support? Some letter writing campaign or Eco-Poster club you could do once a month? I list a few organisations I like here.
https://eclipsenow.wordpress.com/action/

Nelson6666
Nelson6666
1 year ago
Reply to  Eclipse Now

Yest next year and the ones going forward CO2 emmisions will be going up.

Jan Steinman
1 year ago
Reply to  Eclipse Now

HOPE: The Energy Transition tech is here…

The late ecologist Howard Odum taught us that technology is simply a form of embedded energy, or "emergy". That means that if energy goes into decline, so will technology.

Those touting the rate of increase of renewable energy technology are missing the big picture. A large increase in a near-zero amount is still a near-zero amount. Solar and wind penetration into our total energy needs is still in the single digits.

I don't work on hope. I work on evidence.

Kristen C
Kristen C
1 year ago

The problem with such articles and scientitst reports is that they don't know how to speak to the public. We need to know exactly how global warming will impact our lives otherwise we won't listen. Human psychology: If another part of the planet is destroyed I don't care much. If my town and investments are at risk, then i will listen.

ThisOldMan
ThisOldMan
1 year ago
Reply to  Kristen C

True but not right. Tragically. Besides they mostly wouldn't believe it even if you phrased it that way. Witness 70M+ Trump voters (not that a Harris win would buy us much more than a decade before collapse …).

Eclipse Now
1 year ago
Reply to  ThisOldMan

The mathematics shows that we WILL go over 1.5 degrees. But while that's bad – real bad – other trends are happening that are exponentially good. So I don't know if collapse is technically inevitable. Hey – some mistake in Ai or computer systems and we're in WW3! But technically inevitable due to energy collapse? That's just some prime Doomium right there!