I was reading some essay about gardening on the internet, and it sent me an advertisement for someone’s cool permaculture-inspired system that “produces a huge amount of food for only a few hours of work each month.”
I’ve seen that claim before, and I ever time I see it I laugh. Because, yes, it is much less work to grow perennial foods and you can definitely have an extremely productive garden while devoting only a fairly minimal amount of time to it, if you know what you are doing, but there’s a catch. Or, rather, several of them. Big ones.
First of all, there’s the learning curve to know what you are doing. As far I know, there’s no system in the world that will save you from making mistakes, so the odds are very good that it is going to take you a number of years of gardening to get any good at it, and you are going to devote more time to it at the beginning because you aren’t as good at it.
Growing food is just like every other exercise – no one learns to rock climb, knit, box, embroider, run, dance, make art, build things, etc… without a LOT of time being less productive than they’d like to be to get the skill set. Gardening and farming is the same. Yes, technically you can do a lot with a little. But optimization is a product of competence. And competence takes time.
And for the purposes of this post, even more importantly, let’s just say that there IS some magic system that will allow you to grow tons and tons of food, all you want, with minimal labor in soil preparation, planting, weeding, etc…. It is still going to be a metric fuckton of work, because THE HARVESTING, PREPARING, PRESERVING AND DEALING WITH THE FOOD IS A TON OF WORK. At least half.
So what cracks me up is the idea that growing a lot of food is going to be no problem, because the problem is then that you’ve grown a lot of food and you need to deal with it.
The reason we ignore this, of course, is that cooking, preserving and dealing with food and what to eat and how is women’s work. And we devalue women’s work enormously. The historic division of labor in agriculture recognizes that planting and hunting are actually no more onerous than harvesting and cooking and preserving – otherwise, it wouldn’t have taken multiple people to do it – but because women’s work doesn’t “count” we erase it. And now that erasure is leading people to miss the critical 1/2 of the agriculture work historically done by women, that needs to be done now by everyone.
Imagine writing that about any other activity “We teach you our simple system to help you take down any tree and ensure that you will have enough wood in that tree to get a ton of firewood!” “We teach you our foolproof hack that lets you get to work in half the time so that your day is basically over when you get there!” “We help you produce an almost infinite amount of code fast that you can just apply to any program!” So. Much. Bullshit.
You see the problem, right? Making a lot of stuff is only good if you know what to do with it, and the work is in the doing things. But we don’t “count” that as part of gardening or farming.
That doesn’t mean you have to cook or can everything – maybe you want to give your surplus away? Maybe sell it? After all that’s what a lot of farmers do, right? But THINK ABOUT IT. All those things take time and energy and resources – going to market is a ton- of work, so is preserving food.
Even finding appropriate places to *distribute and donate and making sure the folks who get it have access to what they need to preserve and prepare it is a lot of work (when I ran Schenectady Urban Farms and when I ran a CSA, this was a very large portion of my labor.)
My own garden year really starts the previous fall, but let’s pretend it starts in February when I start the first seeds, and ends in November when we clean up the garden. From February to June, most of the work is planting, weeding, tilling, transplanting, fertilizing, bed preparation, staking, trellising, etc…
Somewhere in June, the workload shifts to weeding, of course, and to harvesting, cooking, and preserving (and donating, because we also give a lot away) our food. And I work just as hard making sure the food doesn’t go to waste as I do getting the ground worked in the spring. The work is hard, hot, tiring and stressful – and also rewarding, delicious and wonderful. And it is a ton of work.
Now most gardeners really only want a small amount of food to eat fresh as side dishes – a few tomatoes, salad greens, a few favorite vegetables, and there’s nothing wrong with that, as long as you recognize that this is just growing salad, and bears the same relationship to growing your own food that making one scarf does to making all your clothing.
If you want to make a meaningful dent in your own diet, or your community’s diet, if you are concerned with longer term food security or think you might need to grow some quantity of what you eat, (and we are not going to grow all our food, folks, so let’s be realistic) this is a really important part of this. When I ran our community farm, I often saw people who would work diligently at the production of food – but were completely mystified by what to do with it. And that leads to a lot of waste.
Now the good thing is that your instincts about what you’d need to do to deal with this might not be right. Almost everyone immediately sees the word “preservation” and thinks “canning” – and quite a lot of people are overwhelmed by the idea. And you CAN preserve a lot of things that way.
But let us remember that for most of human history, canned food didn’t exist, and it is by no means the best or only way to preserve every food. Honestly, I advise people who are new to food preservation to start with dehydration and fermentation, and expand from there.
But there’s another step most people miss before that – learning to really eat the food – changing your diet. Now if you are growing it, you may already know you like carrots or tomatoes or peppers, right? But do you know how to eat these things AS MAJOR PARTS OF YOUR DIET?
Do you know how to preserve them, and eat the thing you preserve as a substantial source of calories and or nutrition? If you think you will only eat a lot of what you grow best in an emergency, that’s a problem, as we all know from covid, in a stressful situation you will want more familiarity, not less. If the foods you need to eat aren’t part of your diet and a source of comfort to you already, you are going to have a problem.
If you want to grow food (or even buy and eat primarily local food), you will need to do a bunch of things differently.
1. Recognize that it isn’t enough to plant stuff, that fully half the work happens when the stuff comes in. That means you need to plan for and figure out who will do the work of harvesting, cooking, preserving and figuring out meals that work with this. That is WORK and it takes TIME and it deserves to be treated as such. If you don’t have time to eat your eggplants and green beans and are buying fast food most days, that’s not growing your own food.
2. That serious gardeners and small home farmers eat differently. That the work of changing your diet to actually use all this food is a big job, and takes time and practice. If you grow food and don’t actually eat it most of the time, you aren’t growing much of your food. You need to spend time learning things, trying out recipes, techniques and ideas to make food palatable to your family. And that takes time and is work.
3. 1/4 of all food in the world is lost to food waste. Reducing waste IS AS IMPORTANT as producing food. It is lost to waste at multiple points in the system – in the field, when things can’t be harvested in time, in transport, at the point of preservation, and in your fridge when you don’t eat them for the fourth day in a row. Someone who grows food needs to be alert to all the stages (and no, there is no future with zero food waste – we can reduce it, but not eliminate it.)
4. If you think of food preservation and cooking unusual ingredients (or unusual parts of ingredients) as less important than the exciting, dramatic work of planting, you are probably internalizing some big fucking sexist shit, and should get over it right this minute. If you are a dude (or dude-like) and implicitly assuming your wife or girlfriend or some chick who works full time too will be better at doing this work than you are, or it is less important than your more manly projects, you are being an asshole. The truth is that if you look at agricultural societies they ALL share the heavy labor of harvesting and preserving, and even if women do the majority of cooking they do that AS A JOB. We need to count the unseen labor and openly evaluate who will do it and how they will be recompensed.
5. Growing food is literally a year round job. December and January are basically my only months off. If you think gardens are grown between May and September, unless you live in Alaska, you are missing a lot of food growing opportunities. But to do it, someone has to have the time, resources, knowledge and know how.
So yeah, when someone tells me “I can make a shit-ton of work for you to do in only a few hours a month” I recognize that they are either a. a cis white dude with a wife who he thinks magically does it for him or b. an idiot. Or maybe both. And if you are starting to grow food and thinking that dealing with all that eggplant looks like work…, you are catching on.
Photo by Sandie Clarke on Unsplash






Comments
We changed commenting systems on September 10, 2026 as part of a site-wide functionality and security upgrade. Your past comments have not disappeared, and you can still log in with your old Disqus account credentials if you wish. Contact us with any questions.
I enjoyed this piece–the only place I’m skeptical is the idea that with enough experience and permaculture ideas, you COULD grow most of your food in a few hours a month. Show me someone who does that. Also, I stick up for canning–over freezing because once the canning is done, the food can sit on a shelf for years with no further energy input. Over fermenting and drying because the former takes some expertise and isn’t good for everything, and the latter takes either a fair amount of energy or a solar dryer which works well in some climates but not well if you’re getting clouds and rain through the time when your produce is coming in. I liked best the reality check about how growing some fresh tomatoes and lettuce is not “growing my own food.” One often sees claims about how you can grow most of your food on some tiny plot–no you can’t. That guy is Quebec who writes books bragging about how he “feeds 200 families” from his 1 1/2 acres–no, he supplies them with some greens, maybe 5% of their calories. No surprise he also says he buys compost because it takes such expertise to make compost…ha ha. No, you can fling all your extra organic matter in a heap and make compost–doing it with expertise can make it faster but it does not take expertise or the ability to read and write or do arithmetic to make compost. He buys it because his time and his land is fully occupied with squeezing all that produce out of 1 1/2 acres–the organic matter must be replenished and has to come from elsewhere.
Good piece, even if I didn’t really like the tone in point 4. (I am a dude – and I certainly make most of the food preparations in this household, canning, smoking, salting, curing,drying, fermenting, pickling, sausing, juicing, brewing etc etc. ) I participated in an urban farming project a few years and the growing was quite successful, but I realized that most of these young people, males or females made not much difference, didn¨t even know how to cook, much less to preserve and prepare food. Even those that were vegetarians or vegans didn’t really know what to do with the vegetables.
I don’t know, anytime I hear tech-capitalism boasting yet another “revolution” that produces something in massive quantity and/or at massive speed vs. the usual methods, I immediately think the output must have correspondingly massive quality losses (read: nutrient deficits). It’s always about quantity over quality with these damn capitalists, and I don’t know any single example where this hasn’t been the case. Nature doesn’t produce anything in massive quantities or at massive speeds when it’s nurturing life, only when it’s destroying it.
One of the best posts ever!
I live in the tropics, so maybe my experience is atypical, but I’d say all the work of soil preparation, planting, mulching, weeding and watering when needed is less than a third of the work involved in getting food into one’s mouth, maybe even less than a quarter. Growing the food is the easy part. It’s after the food is grown that the work begins.
And while there is considerable skill in growing food, it’s a small part of the learning curve. A bigger part is figuring out what to grow and what to do with it after its grown. The proportions are even more extreme with livestock. Growing a sheep, goat or cow is pretty easy if you have both sexes in a fenced grassy field. The work is getting some meat onto the plate.
I will admit that in a situation where starvation is the only alternative, people can live on a pretty simple cuisine that mostly consists of boiling a basic starchy tuber without any more work than rinsing it off and throwing it in a pot. Here’s a picture of people who probably wished they had more work to do in the kitchen.
https://www.vangoghgallery.com/catalog/Painting/453/Potato-Eaters,-The.html
Yes, a good reality check. This stuff is hard, and growing a few lettuce on the balcony is not calories. However, I must be honest. I’m a fan of “Precision Fermentation”. It’s the ultimate green tech – of equal importance to the modern world as renewable energy. It’s factory grown food that just needs electricity, water, and a tiny sprinkling of mineral fertilisers. The best bit? It could feed 10 billion people from a tiny area the size of greater London! Historically we’ve chopped down 2 billion hectares of forest to graze livestock for very inefficient proteins and fats. It’s so inefficient because photosynthesis only uses about 6% of incoming sunlight to grow grass that is inedible to us – or wheat and corn where only a small part of the plant is edible – and most of it is carbs. It has only a tiny bit of what we really want, fats and proteins. THEN we make it worse by letting livestock eat grass at another vastly worse conversion rate into fats and proteins.
Instead, Precision Fermentation uses solar power which is 20% efficient, and all that extra energy is used to split water (now down to 16%) and the hydrogen from that is fed to special bacteria that eat hydrogen. THEN we eat the bacteria! It’s so much more direct. Here’s the mind-blowing take away: we’ve invented a process MORE EFFICIENT THAN PHOTOSYNTHESIS! And instead of giving us a plant with a small amount of carbs and tiny amount of protein and fat – it’s ALL PROTEIN AND FAT! But fermented bacteria, yuk! Except you just can’t say that if you like bread or cheese or beer or wine. Of course we give the bacteria to food techs who turn it into fish-sticks, chicken tenders and bacon strips.
Then let’s return that 2 billion hectares we chopped down back to the forests. That’s enough space for 3 TRILLION trees! Let’s regrow that. It would soak up ALL historical CO2 emissions. PF will feed the world abundant cheap food that’s safe from flood and drought – and will not cause pandemics like Covid. It will conserve nature, giving forest homes to countless animals. And it would solve climate change. Win win win. “Brave Robot” are already selling PF ice-cream and cream cheese, and others are making palm oil and yoghurt and soon there will be lots of PF milk. Please watch George Monbiot explain more here – just 6 minutes. It’s the best technology since renewable energy: https://youtu.be/6eaTIe_TBZA