Building a world of
resilient communities.

MAIN LIST

 

UK will not hit renewable energy targets, says Lords report

A parliamentary report warned the British government Wednesday that it is unlikely to meet its targets to produce 10 per cent of the country`s electricity from renewable energy sources by 2010.

The Lords Science and Technology Committee said that the reason was because of insufficient long-term incentives for investors in the sector.

"The Government`s drive to cut greenhouse gas emissions and secure our energy supply should be applauded, but it`s not going about it the right way," said committee chairman Lord Oxburgh. He said that energy from renewable sources was expensive and if the government wants private sector investment to achieve its targets, "it needs to provide more reassurance about long-term returns."

"The current support arrangements favour only those developments that will give a quick return, in effect onshore wind farms," the cross-bench peer said. The report studied the practical implementation of the Government`s policy on renewables and examined the potential of a wide range of sources, from wind and energy crops to tidal power and biomass, which uses degradable plant or animal material.

It found that wind is the UK`s most abundant source of renewable energy that could be built quickly, but warned that these have to be backed up from conventional plant for times when demand is high and there is little wind. The committee criticized the Government for not giving energy the priority it deserves and called for the appointment of a minister with the sole responsibility for energy rather than the current portfolio which is shared with e-commercials and competitiveness. It also called for improved co-ordination between government departments and for the establishment of a UK Energy Research to be expedited.

The British government seems to believe that market forces alone will prevent the lights going out, the report said, warning that members of the committee were "not so sure" this would be achieved.

What do you think? Leave a comment below.

Sign up for regular Resilience bulletins direct to your email.

Take action!  

Find out more about Community Resilience. See our COMMUNITIES page
Start your own projects. See our RESOURCES page.
Help build resilience. DONATE NOW.

 

This is a community site and the discussion is moderated. The rules in brief: no personal abuse and no climate denial. Complete Guidelines.


Fracking and Health: What we Know from Pennsylvania's Gas Boom

Tensions between economic development, energy policy and environmental and …

Peak Oil Review: A Midweek Update - 24th Aug 2016

 A midweek update. It has been a volatile three days for oil with …

How We Went on an Energy Diet, and What We Lost (and Gained!)

In which I reveal the changes in our household energy usage from 2003 …

Five Billion Years of Energy Supply: the "Stereosphere" and the Upcoming Photovoltaic Revolution

Both the biosphere and the stereosphere use solar light as the energy …

Peak Oil Review - Aug 22 2016

 A weekly roundup of peak oil  news, including: -Oil and the …

Limitless imagination and physical limits

How do we distinguish those ideas that are forever going to remain in the …

Some Reflections on the Twilight of the Oil Age (part III)

The impact of the Tooth Fairy Syndrome is all the more felt in the main …