Building a world of
resilient communities.

MAIN LIST

 

UK will not hit renewable energy targets, says Lords report

A parliamentary report warned the British government Wednesday that it is unlikely to meet its targets to produce 10 per cent of the country`s electricity from renewable energy sources by 2010.

The Lords Science and Technology Committee said that the reason was because of insufficient long-term incentives for investors in the sector.

"The Government`s drive to cut greenhouse gas emissions and secure our energy supply should be applauded, but it`s not going about it the right way," said committee chairman Lord Oxburgh. He said that energy from renewable sources was expensive and if the government wants private sector investment to achieve its targets, "it needs to provide more reassurance about long-term returns."

"The current support arrangements favour only those developments that will give a quick return, in effect onshore wind farms," the cross-bench peer said. The report studied the practical implementation of the Government`s policy on renewables and examined the potential of a wide range of sources, from wind and energy crops to tidal power and biomass, which uses degradable plant or animal material.

It found that wind is the UK`s most abundant source of renewable energy that could be built quickly, but warned that these have to be backed up from conventional plant for times when demand is high and there is little wind. The committee criticized the Government for not giving energy the priority it deserves and called for the appointment of a minister with the sole responsibility for energy rather than the current portfolio which is shared with e-commercials and competitiveness. It also called for improved co-ordination between government departments and for the establishment of a UK Energy Research to be expedited.

The British government seems to believe that market forces alone will prevent the lights going out, the report said, warning that members of the committee were "not so sure" this would be achieved.

What do you think? Leave a comment below.

Sign up for regular Resilience bulletins direct to your email.

Take action!  

Find out more about Community Resilience. See our COMMUNITIES page
Start your own projects. See our RESOURCES page.
Help build resilience. DONATE NOW.

 

This is a community site and the discussion is moderated. The rules in brief: no personal abuse and no climate denial. Complete Guidelines.


Naomi Klein & the Let­down of the Leap Manifesto: Poli­tics Doesn't Trump Physics, Nor the Economics of Collapse (part 2/3)

Politics can be egalitarian when going up Hubbert's Curve, but it's a whole …

Carbon Tracker Analysis: ‘Renewables are Already Outcompeting Fossil Fuels’

Clean technologies are already cheaper, on average, than the incumbent …

Timeline: The Past, Present and Future of Germany’s Energiewende

The Energiewende (energy transition) is an internationally recognised …

The Sower's Way: the Path for the Future

Our paper on "The Sower's Way" has been published in the IOP …

Just 16,000 Catenary Trucks Would Use All of California’s Electricity with only 2400 to 8300 Miles of Overhead Wires

It makes sense to electrify trucks since fuel from oil, coal, and natural …

The Energy-Water Nexus  

Energy and water are inextricably linked: It takes energy to supply water, …

Peak Oil Review - Sept 19 2016

 A weekly roundup of peak oil news, including: -Quote of the week …