Building a world of
resilient communities.



Review: Warning to all gas guzzlers: Expect a crude awakening

The problem is easy to describe, but its consequences are fearsome and its solution daunting. The Age of Oil is coming to an end, and the future is precarious. So say two very different new books with very similar titles: David Goodstein's Out of Gas: The End of the Age of Oil and Paul Roberts' The End of Oil: On the Edge of a Perilous New World.

Seeing only the titles, skeptics will react predictably. Despite the current gasoline price spike, we still have plenty of oil. And by the time we start to run low, economic forces will drive technology to develop alternative sources of energy. We'll do just fine by allowing the market do its magic. Caltech Distinguished Service Professor Goodstein and noted magazine writer Mr. Roberts accept the doubters' assumptions, but not their conclusions. Indeed, we have not yet tapped even half of the easily accessible oil, but we will face trouble long before the planetary gas gauge approaches "E."

In Out of Gas, Dr. Goodstein focuses on the problem itself. A compact tutorial, it begins by citing the work of Shell Oil geophysicist M. King Hubbert, who in the 1950s predicted that U.S. domestic oil production would peak in the 1970s when approximately half of the original resource was depleted. Mr. Hubbert's analysis was derided – until it turned out to be correct. Now experts who apply his method to the world as a whole conclude that the global production peak is only a decade or two in the future. After that, supply will increasingly lag demand. Oil shortages will be permanent and increasingly severe.

Dr. Goodstein follows that bleak news with brief science lessons on thermodynamics, electromagnetism and geology. He then discusses the most promising alternative energy technologies, none of which seems like a sure bet. Our problems are not insoluble, but we can't afford to delay. To emphasize that point, he closes with this dire warning: "Civilization as we know it will come to an end sometime in this century unless we can find a way to live without fossil fuels."

But what will the coming crisis look like, what pain will it cause, and what, for that matter, is "civilization as we know it"? In The End of Oil, Mr. Roberts, an expert on the complex interplay of technology, economics and the environment, explores those thorny questions.

He begins with this historical context: Human progress has been the result of transforming energy into wealth. We have used the energy of flowing water and blowing wind, and we have burned dung, wood and coal; but none of these sources have matched oil's ease of distribution and concentration of energy. Ever since the Spindletop gusher of 1901 demonstrated that oil was plentiful and easily extracted and shipped, we have been living in the Age of Oil.

To understand the path from previous energy ages to the present one, and to make conjectures about our transition to a future without cheap, plentiful oil, Mr. Roberts adopts the perspective of an energy economist. He begins by looking at the likeliest replacement sources of energy, including hydrogen fuel cells, advanced wind and solar power technologies, coal gasification and natural gas. He also adds two essential ingredients to the mix: global warming and geopolitics. Those create hidden costs that do not (at present) show up in the price of gasoline at U.S. pumps. Each drop of oil burned adds to the amount of carbon dioxide in the air, which, according to a growing scientific consensus, has already led to an increase in severe weather and consequent economic losses. Politically, the wealth created by oil consumption has been an important factor of American dominance; but because an increasing fraction of that oil must be imported, the major suppliers gain undue influence. We find ourselves in increasingly uncomfortable alliances, needing to assure our economic lifeblood through expensive military means.

Despite the perils ahead, Mr. Roberts proposes a scenario that will enable us to navigate – though not without difficulty – to a future age of sustainable energy use. And just as the readers begin to ask whether that approach is realistic, he acknowledges that any number of events may throw us off course. But the transition can't be avoided. He concludes, "The question facing us isn't whether our energy systems will change – indeed, the process is already well under way – but whether we can live with the outcome."

Physicist, children's science author and book critic Fred Bortz lives in western Pennsylvania.

(c) Fred Bortz 2004

What do you think? Leave a comment below.

Sign up for regular Resilience bulletins direct to your email.

Take action!  

Find out more about Community Resilience. See our COMMUNITIES page
Start your own projects. See our RESOURCES page.
Help build resilience. DONATE NOW.


This is a community site and the discussion is moderated. The rules in brief: no personal abuse and no climate denial. Complete Guidelines.


The Curse of the Modern Office

The information society promises to dematerialise society and make it more …

Howling at the USGS’s Wolfcamp Announcement

The recent USGS announcement about the Wolfcamp play may inspire another …

Transition in Ireland  

Ireland is one of the most advanced countries in energy transition, getting …

Trudeau’s Six Unanswered Questions on Kinder Morgan Expansion

In early November, the Trudeau government tabled a ministerial panel report …

Tiffany's Fallacy: the Mineral Pie is Shrinking, and Most of What's Left is in the Sky

In the debates that deal with energy and fossil fuels, it is rather common …

Peak Oil in a Fact-Free World: the New "Oil Bonanza" in West Texas

So, the USGS comes out with a press release that the media immediately …

Why the Office Needs a Typewriter Revolution

Artificial cooling and digital equipment are the main drivers behind the …