Society featured

Republican Politics of the Absurd and the Climate Debate

April 5, 2024

Like many Americans, I was gob-smacked the other morning when I saw the video of Baltimore’s Francis Scott Key bridge collapse. Disasters of such magnitude take lives as well as forever changing those that survive.

Living in the Baltimore, Washington area, I’ve often driven over the Key Bridge, as have family and friends. The 1.6-mile-long bridge is a major route up and down the Atlantic seaboard, handling over 11 million vehicles annually. Had the collapse occurred during rush hour, the death toll could have been staggering. As it is, lives were lost, and the destruction of the bridge is going to have significant economic consequences for Baltimore, the nation, and the environment.

However, this story isn’t about the lost bridge’s economic, environmental, and human costs. It’s a story about how some Republican members of Congress have suggested some patently absurd reasons for the disaster. It’s a reflection of what’s happening in Washington.

First, a few facts about the Port of Baltimore and the Francis Scott Key Bridge:

  • The Port of Baltimore is the tenth largest in the nation based on container imports, according to Moody’s Analytics.
  • The port handled a record 52.3 million tons of international cargo worth about $80.8 billion. (Axios)
  • It’s the largest port in the nation for vehicles. In 2022, 847,158 cars and light trucks passed through it. The facility also handled 1.3 million tons of farm and construction machinery.
  • The port supports more than 15,000 direct jobs and more than 139,000 indirect jobs connected to the port, generating almost $3.3 billion in total personal income. (Axios)
  • The Port of Baltimore is closer to the Midwest than any other East Coast port and an overnight drive to one-third of the nation’s population.
  •  In the near term, the bridge collapse will cause the loss of $2 million in wages a day and 8,000 jobs.
  • The port is the second largest in the US for coal exports, especially to India.

Maryland Governor McKee announced that “state consultants believe the old bridge can be demolished and a new one built in 18 to 24 months at a cost of $250 million to $300 million.” Transportation Secretary Buttigieg has promised to “assist in removing barriers and regulations to help speed up the rebuilding process.”

Although it’s too early to know for certain, it appears that the ship (the DALI) lost power, and the currents and momentum of the massive vessel carried it into the concrete bridge support. An experienced pilot was on board, and they tried to drop the anchor. The crew acted quickly, telling authorities to stop traffic. The six lost lives were construction workers.

Responding to the disaster, Representative Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-GA), a close ally of the former president and an uber-conservative, suggested in a post on X (formerly Twitter) that it was an “intentional act.” Steve Bannon, a far-right populist influencer, also thought that terrorism was at work. There’s absolutely no evidence of the collision being anything other than an unfortunate accident—which arguably might change once more is known.

Other Republicans in Congress suggest that the blame rests with President Biden and his administration. Representative Nancy Mace (R-SC), who cast the deciding vote to oust former House Speaker Kevin McCarthy (R-CA), told Newsmax that the bipartisan infrastructure bill of 2021 was mainly “the Green New Deal.”

The congresswoman implied that the administration was using most of the appropriated funds for public transportation, which is associated with reducing greenhouse gas emissions from autos—leaving very little for highway and bridge construction and repair. The claim is fanciful.

The bridge collapsed because a ship longer than a football fieldweighing 95,000 tons (empty) and carrying 4,700 containers, crashed into a concrete bridge support that wasn’t built to withstand such collisions. Greene and Mace are hardly the only Republicans attempting to turn the bridge disaster into a hyperpartisan issue. Nor are their suggestions the most outrageous—that title goes to Utah State Representative Phil Lyman (R).

According to Lyman, bridges collapsing “is what happens when you have Governors who prioritize diversity over the wellbeing and security of citizens.” His X (formerly Twitter) message reposted an image and short bio of Commissioner for the Port of Baltimore Karenthia Barber—a black woman who is a highly regarded consultant, strategist, and speaker with experience in education, human resources, and business. In a subsequent post referencing the collision, he said: “DEI = DIE.”

Baltimore’s mayor, Brandon Scott, “has been a [special] target” on X, the site formerly known as Twitter, for no apparent reason other than his being black.  A former Republican state legislator from Florida also posted a video clip of the Key Bridge collapsing with the caption, “DEI did this.” There were others.

Congress won’t return from its Easter vacation until the second week in April. Whether the GOP will support the federal government’s paying for part of the recovery bill is unclear at this point. At least one MAGA-aligned House member, Dan Meuser (R-PA), is raising questions on whether the federal government should share the cost of debris removal, reopening shipping channels, and rebuilding the bridge. His concerns came out in an attack on Biden for promising that the federal government would help pay for the recovery.

Meuser suggested that the president could find the aid money by pulling “cash from the ‘ridiculous” electric vehicle deployment program that Congress voted for earlier.” The representative refers to funds found in the previously enacted bi-partisan Infrastructure bill and the Inflation Reduction Act.

Climate activists would do well to get used to the MAGA-aligned members in Congress proposing to take funds for anything new from whatever is left in the infrastructure and IRA accounts for clean energy and combatting climate change.

What worries me—beyond the brazen stupidity and crass racism of blaming diversity policies and other unsupported accusations, i.e., terrorism, as the origin of the Dali’s run-in with Charm City’s Francis Scott Key Bridge—is having no mutually accepted, good faith, rules of engagement and resolution.

So far, the culture war comments are coming from just a few Republican politicians and far-right pundits like Fox host Maria Bartiromo, who repeatedly “attempted to link border security policies to the bridge collapse” in an interview with Senator Rick Scott (R-FL). However, that doesn’t mean that those Republicans standing mute are helping things any.

Although hyperpartisanship pre-dates the ex-president, there’s no denying that Mr. Trump has made lying and the disregard of provable facts a part of the new GOP ethos. It appears that the Republican National Committee (RNC) will not hire anyone who doesn’t swear on Trump’s God Bless the USA bible—at the very low cost of $59.99—that the 2020 election was stolen out from under him.

I know I’m hardly alone in thinking that the wheels of American democracy feel like they’re coming off the cart. How will we ever solve pressing problems when the debates are so disingenuous?

Joel Stronberg

Joel B. Stronberg, Esq., of The JBS Group is a veteran clean energy policy analyst with over 30 years of experience, based in Washington, DC. He writes about energy and politics in his blog Civil Notion (www.civilnotion.com) and has recently published the book Earth v. TrumpThe Climate Defenders’ Guide to Washington Politics based on his commentaries. He has worked extensively in the clean energy fields for public and private sector clients at all levels of government and in Latin America. His specialties include: resiliency; distributed generation and storage; utility regulation; financing mechanisms; sustainable agriculture; and human behavior. Stronberg is a frequent presenter at conferences and workshops.

Comments

Welcome to the new Resillience commenting system!

We have moved from the former Disqus commenting system to a new system as of September 10, 2026.

  • Your past comments have not disappeared.
  • You can log in with your old Disqus credentials, as well as Gmail credentials or a Resilience account (formerly Resilience+). Login with Facebook and other credentials is coming soon.

We made this change because of privacy concerns regarding Disqus. It's also part of a set of changes to bring more services to the Resilience community under a single login: commenting, (coming September 2026), and online courses (coming 2027). Unfortunately, your old Disqus comments may not reliably link to your account in this new system. Please contact us if you have any questions or concerns.

Subscribe
Notify of
6 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
The Kid
The Kid
2 years ago

This bridge collapse caused by commercial traffic and the even more egregious train derailment in East Palestine, OH resembles the train catastrophe climax in the novel Atlas Shrugged. The recent catastrophes are clearly the result of the crony capitalism ruling American society rather than the socialism and philosophy of progressive liberalism the power elites, their political lackeys, and Ayn Rand blame. More troubling is the lack of any acknowledgement of this corrupt state of society by objectivists and liberals, who are as accustomed to the naturalness of capitalist authority (and its catastrophes) as any other American subjects. As events like these, as well as increased natural calamities, occur the response to abandon and renounce participation in such a society does not appear except by a very few. None of whom are elites.

FRANCIS VOISEY
FRANCIS VOISEY
2 years ago
Reply to  The Kid

I cannot understand the ridiculous amount of hype that the East Palestine derailment has caused. Anyone would think that 200 people had died in the accident from the amount of attention that it has received and continues to have over a year later. As it was I understand that no one died and I am not sure that anyone was even injured. Train derailments happen now and then, even on the best maintained systems, due to a variety of causes. Railroads are still the safest form of land transport, far safer than roads.

The Kid
The Kid
2 years ago
Reply to  FRANCIS VOISEY

As a place to live, the town of East Palestine was destroyed and the lives of its residents ruined from exposure to many toxic chemicals from this industrial accident. They are just not dead yet. Overlooked by the claim ‘no one died’ are the tens of thousands of animals that perished from the spills of chemicals into the waterways in the area. Railways may be safer than roads for land transport of industrial goods, but not if safety measures are deregulated, which is how and why crony capitalism increases the risks for these disasters.

theinitiate
theinitiate
2 years ago

No one…seems to me too …anything I regard to the ship…loosing power…that..to me…is WHY the collapse of the bridge happened…and..I don’t think..it was some kind of purposeful event ..but .we should be hearing why that did happen…what was wrong with the ship that it lost power?…When was it last inspected ..sooo…yeah .it was all pretty much an extremely sad TRAJEDY…but ..I think it is important for people to stop wondering about the bridge and wonder about the ship… Jist sayin’ ..

pokiwi
pokiwi
2 years ago

That’s food for thought…

It is looking more and more like a cascading descent, globally/socially. More wars, more refugees, more poverty, more desperation – all backdropped by more entropy, more depletion and more climate variance. I used to think we’d all come to the thoughtful table, when the thinking was needed. Now, I don’t believe that; I think collapsing societies may always have descended in a cacophony of narratives, none correct.

Statistically, this event won’t be the last, nor was the Ever Given…

FRANCIS VOISEY
FRANCIS VOISEY
2 years ago

OK Fair enough. I was doubtless not aware, writing from the UK, of the full effects of the accident on the local population. From reading the reports of the National Transportation Safety Board I perhaps also had a misleading view of how regulated your railroads are. I stand corrected.