Society featured

Inclusive Transportation: Excerpt

September 14, 2023

bookcoverFrom Inclusive Transportation by Veronica O. Davis. Copyright © 2023 Veronica O. Davis. Reproduced by permission of Island Press, Washington, D.C.

My Manifesto

Everyone deserves safe, reliable, and affordable transportation options. By this, I mean that anytime someone needs to get from point A to point B, they have multiple options. I repeat, I am not anti-car. However, I believe strongly that driving in a vehicle alone should not be the default or the only option.

As we look to correct the historical injustices of the transportation system, we cannot use the same tools or the same thinking that disconnected communities. Specifically, this means not building highways and expanding roads that require taking homes and businesses from people. We should not bisect communities, nor should we expand roads to accommodate single-occupancy vehicles.

I do acknowledge there are plenty of places throughout the country that have two-lane roads that are wholly inadequate for the current and future populations. However, roads generally can be expanded without the need to acquire entire properties. Generally, in urban areas, expanding a roadway can mean taking someone’s entire property, including their home. In less populated areas, expanding a roadway may mean needing only a few feet of someone’s property. In addition, roadway expansion can improve the quality of life for people in less dense areas with sidewalks and other infrastructure; for example, it could connect communities on septic systems within their individual properties to a municipal sanitary sewer system. We just need to think about what most people really need. I have several goals for writing this book. I hope they are helpful.

Disrupt the Status Quo of the Transportation Industry

We are at a time in history unlike anything experienced by previous generations of engineers and planners. The global pandemic was such a major disruption to life as we knew it that the tools of the past will not be as effective—if they are effective at all.

Prior to the COVID-19 pandemic, only about 6 percent of people in the United States worked from home.10 In May 2020, almost three months into the pandemic, about 35 percent of people were working remotely.11 Some companies have implemented permanent telework programs, and others continue to struggle to get their employees to return to the office. Part of what is dubbed “the Great Resignation” is made up of people seeking remote work opportunities.12 Even as life begins to settle to a new normal, traffic volumes and transit ridership during peak hours have not returned to prepandemic levels in some cities.

We base many transportation decisions on traffic volumes. Currently, we project future traffic volumes using historical trends and using a travel demand model. The specific model inputs and assumptions vary by state and city. The model may account for growth in population and employment. I have seen some travel demand models that assume any new population will move the same as the current population even if people have other options. For example, the model might say that if 1 percent of the population is biking to work today, then 1 percent of people will bike in the future, despite the possibility that new bicycle infrastructure could be added. Not only was that the wrong way of looking to the future before the pandemic, but now, how do we project the new normal of significantly more people telecommuting?

When we project the future on the basis of the past, it leads to overestimating future traffic volumes. The main tool to accommodate the growth in traffic volumes has been expanding roadways to add more lanes. As the transportation adage goes, we cannot build our way out of congestion. Large projects that expand the number of vehicles that can travel are expensive and take decades to design and build. Even researchers acknowledge that expanding the roadways actually increases traffic volumes; this is what is known as induced demand,13 or, stated in another way, a self-fulfilling prophesy.

Autonomous and electric vehicles are not going to save us if everyone is still alone in the vehicle. Electric vehicles are cleaner, but the industry and state and federal governments have not yet created a holistic means to capture the impact these vehicles will have on the roadways. The gas tax is what funds the national Highway Trust Fund. Since electric vehicles are not using gas, they are not contributing to the trust fund, even though they are using the roadways funded by it. At the most recent conferences I have attended, there still seems to be a misalignment of expectations of autonomous vehicles between the car companies and advocates, particularly the disability and safety advocates. Regardless of all that, if autonomous and electric vehicles do as they predict, all we will achieve is moving congestion more efficiently, with cleaner air.

The larger point is that none of us know the future. If we continue to project from today using trends from the past, we will get the future we predict. My whole goal, which I discuss more in chapter 6, is for you to think about what you want the future to be and then work backward.

For example, if you want a future where 80 percent of trips are by public transit, walking, and biking, you need to develop a plan to get there. In contrast, if today you are at only 10 percent and you use the historical growth models, the goal will look different.

Reflect and Elevate

Ongoing acceptance of “This is how we have always done it” continues to harm communities similar to that of my grandparents, who were displaced in the 1960s. In 2022, there are highway projects proposed by state departments of transportation that will remove hundreds of homes and businesses for the sake of added capacity. Many of the same communities still have people living who remember when the state built the highway originally. While it is easy to look at these egregious examples and wag our fingers, this book is a call for personal reflection.

For planners and engineers, this is a call for you to reflect on projects, plans, or policies that you have worked on and to think about the impacts they have had on communities. There will be opportunities to evaluate how you would do things differently. I will share my reflections on projects that did not go as planned and even ones that went well, but I still have my “Wish we would have . . .” moments.

For anyone engaged in advocacy, this is a call for you to look at your coalitions, messaging, and tactics. Do they meet the needs of the communities you are attempting to serve? Are you speaking for them or helping to amplify their voice? Elected leaders will be able to reflect on their actions or inactions. Finally, if you are in a position to write about transportation projects and their effects, it is your duty to interrogate your narratives and language regarding transportation projects. Are you still using the passive voice, saying “A car hit a person walking down the street,” or do you refer to the person who performed the action—the driver? Are they accidents, crashes, or traffic violence? There has been a lot of rich conversation about how the way we write about issues can obscure the truth or make it more palatable. It is time to change.

This book is a request for you to elevate your consciousness. Not in a way that is performative or even overly apologetic. It requires you to build empathy for communities regardless of your role in the decision-making process. Then, once you unlock that consciousness, evaluate how you will be better and do better.

Keep Us Focused on the Little Things with Major Impacts

As technology and the world continue to change, there will still be the last-mile and, in some cases, last-few-feet connections. I am by no means anti-technology. I love how applications have evolved such that from the phone in your hand you can pay your transit fare and know when the next bus is coming. The next generation of applications promises the ability to plan travel using multiple modes, for example, using a bike share to transit and then walking the rest of the way.

However, all the widgets and gadgets are no substitute for people’s ability to move on their own by walking; by using a device that assists them with moving, such as a wheelchair or a rolling walker; or by riding a bicycle. The bicycle was invented almost four hundred years before the first automobile. As technologies have come and gone, the bicycle has remained. I think some of the best technologies enhance these choices, such as the applications I mentioned, rather than revolutionize the entire system. E-bikes are a great example because they allow new riders who are physically unable to ride long distances to participate in that mode of transportation. Transit applications on the phone provide real-time information on the location of buses, trains, and so forth, and when the next one will arrive.

I used the term “last-mile connection” and expanded it to “last-few feet connection,” which refers to a gap in the transportation network. For example, an autonomous, on-demand mode of transit may get people to a bus stop near where they work or live. However, are they able to get from where they live to the bus stop? In addition, there will be trips of only one or two blocks that are easier to walk or use a device that assists people with moving. And sometimes it is just as simple as people liking to move without being in a vehicle.

We cannot allow technology to distract us from the need to create safe, affordable communities where people can walk, wheel, or bike short distances to meet their basic needs. This means streets with plenty of space to move, trees to shade, and places to take a break. In many cities, it means reclaiming space that is currently dedicated to moving or storing motor vehicles.

Give You More than an Idea or a Catchphrase

One of the books I keep on my nightstand is Think and Grow Rich by Napoleon Hill. What I love about the book, beyond the great information it provides, is that it includes questions for reflection and actionable steps. That is my goal. To give you a book that you can read from cover to cover or skip around in based on your interest, underline, and tab for future reference. Some ideas may seem repetitive, but my aim is for you to be able to refer back to pieces and still have the context.

In the end, I hope you will use this book to improve how you approach your work, whether it be a project, a plan, a policy, a grassroots campaign, or even an opinion piece.

Pause for Reflection

While sharing my personal transportation story, I invited you to think about yours. Take a moment to write your transportation story. How has your history shaped who you are today? Think about where you lived, how you spent time getting around, and how that affected your days. Beyond your résumé, who are you? How does transportation play a role in this? What is your view of what the future of transportation could be?

Notes:

  1. Better Bike Share Partnership, “Who We Are,” accessed September 10, 2022, https://betterbikeshare.org/about/who-we-are/.
  2. L. Dara Baldwin et al., “My Back Is Still the Bridge,” in “The White Problem in Planning,” ed. William Curran-Groome, special issue, Carolina Planning Journal 46 (2021): 79–90, https://issuu.com/carolinaplanningjournal/docs/vol_46_whiteproblem_in_planning.
  3. National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, “2020 Fatality Data Show Increased Traffic Fatalities during Pandemic,” June 3, 2021, https://www.nhtsa.gov/press-releases/2020-fatality-data-show-increased-traffic-fatalities-during-pandemic.
  4. National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, “USDOT Releases New Data Showing That Road Fatalities Spiked in First Half of 2021,” October 28, 2021, https://www.nhtsa.gov/press-releases/usdot-releases-new-data-showing-road-fatalities-spiked-first-half-2021.
  5. Chicago Council on Global Affairs, “Reclaiming the Right to the City,” September 2021, https://www.thechicagocouncil.org/sites/default/files/2021-09/CCGA%20Reclaiming%20the%20Right%20to%20the%20City_vFb.pdf.

Veronica Davis

Veronica O. Davis is Director of Transportation & Drainage Operations for Houston, Texas, leading the team responsible for maintaining and improving the infrastructure that spans Houston’s 671 square miles. Veronica has nearly 20 years of experience in engineering and transportation planning. She is an Entrepreneur and Civil Engineer, co-founding Nspiregreen, LLC., which manages Community, Multimodal Transportation, and Environmental planning and consulting. While at Nspiregreen, she led the Vision Zero Action Plans for Washington, DC and the City of Alexandria. She co-founded Black Women Bike, an organization and movement which builds a community and interest in biking among black women through education, advocacy and recreation. Veronica was recognized as a Champion of Change by the White House in 2012 for her professional accomplishments and advocacy. Veronica graduated with Bachelor of Science from University of Maryland College Park and a Master of Engineering and a Master of Regional and Urban Planning, Land Use and Environmental Planning from Cornell University. She completed graduate work towards a PhD in Civil Engineering from University of Maryland College Park. Veronica serves on the committees for Transportation Research Board, the board for America Walks, as well as technical advisory boards at the University of Maryland and Cornell University.

Tags: building resilient transport systems, sustainable transport