Introducing Petrolify® – new video from the Post Carbon Institute (side effects may vary)
Our energy and climate systems are being pushed to the edge. With global supplies entering a new era of insecurity, the scramble to prop up business as usual has intensified.
European Energy Commissioner Guenther Oettinger revealed the EU is drawing up a Plan B to protect gas supplies should Russia cut off Ukraine with knock on effects in Europe – as it did in 2006 and 2008-9. Measures could include limiting industrial use of gas to safeguard household supplies. Any illusions that US shale gas exports might be a solution to Europe’s dependence on Russia were doused by International Energy Agency boss Maria van der Hoeven, who told a recent conference that “a few tens of [billion cubic feet] of LNG will not make much difference, given that OECD-Europe production continues to fall by similar quantities.”
In the UK, National Grid unveiled a contingency plan against a potential capacity crunch. Several power stations have been shut down recently, including four nuclear reactors for safety reasons, increasing the prospect of power cuts this winter. The mitigation plan consists of voluntary demand reduction by large energy users during peak periods, and contracts with smaller power generators to add capacity when needed. Outages such as these could become more common across Europe as nuclear power stations built mostly in the 70s and 80s are phased out.
The looming referendum should have opened up a wider debate around energy given Scotland’s key role in UK oil, gas and wind power production, but the rest of the union apparently has no contingency plan should the Yes campaign emerge victorious on September 18. Both sides persist in arguing about the estimated size of remaining North Sea reserves, ignoring the fact that output has slumped two-thirds since the turn of the century.
While politicians and suppliers tinker round the margins, the scale of the problem was again highlighted this week with a leaked IPCC report warning of the “severe, pervasive and irreversible” impacts from climate change. Working to maintain the status quo is no longer an option – we need a Plan B for our entire energy system.
The Energy Crunch team is Simone Osborn, David Strahan, Griffin Carpenter, Stephen Devlin, Aniol Esteban, Tim Jenkins.
nef is a UK’s leading think tank promoting social, economic and environmental justice. nef’s purpose is to bring about a Great Transition – to transform the economy so that it works for people and the planet.
Tags: climate change, energy crisis
Related Articles
'SELECT SQL_CALC_FOUND_ROWS wp_posts.ID
FROM wp_posts LEFT JOIN wp_term_relationships ON (wp_posts.ID = wp_term_relationships.object_id)
WHERE 1=1 AND wp_posts.ID NOT IN (2353833) AND (
wp_term_relationships.term_taxonomy_id IN (1)
) AND wp_posts.post_type = \'post\' AND ((wp_posts.post_status = \'publish\'))
GROUP BY wp_posts.ID
ORDER BY wp_posts.post_date DESC
LIMIT 0, 3'
The claim is ubiquitous: if we’re to meet our climate goals, we need a mass buildout of renewable energy production. But this claim is false, and worse yet, attempting it will accelerate climate collapse.
This week’s Frankly is another edition of Nate’s Wide Boundary News series, where he invites listeners to view the constant churn of headlines through a wider-boundary lens. Today’s edition features reflections on a new peak in crude oil production, the growth of non-dispatchable electricity, and a report recently released by the World Economic Forum assessing global risks.