Unrealized benefits of transport electrification are within reach

July 1, 2007

R. James Woolsey, CIA Director during the 90’s, wrote an editorial in the Wall Street Journal last December talking about the national security advantages of ending the US dependence on imported oil. He described the dramatic reduction of oil imports and greenhouse gas emissions that will happen if transit combustion is moved from the street to power plants. (1)

A week later, GM rolled out the Volt concept car at the Detroit Auto Show. It will be powered by the plug-in hybrid electric drive train that Mr. Woolsey was advocating. (2)

Since electricity costs one third of what we currently spend on gasoline to power cars and recharging would be done overnight, it was apparent to Mr. Woolsey that widespread adoption of plug-in electric drive technology would be practical, particularly since 84% of the 220 million cars on the road in the US can be replaced by plug-in electric cars, having equivalent performance and amenities to the fuel powered cars we drive now, without having to build additional generation and transmission infrastructure. The only remaining bar to implementation was the need for safe and affordable high power batteries with a vehicle lifetime service rating that weren’t available at that time.

Three weeks later, the UN Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) released its 2007 report finding that greenhouse gas emissions coming from human activity are definitely causing global warming and if they are not abated, progressively more severe consequences will follow including the flooding of our coast lines – a key finding was that the ocean level has been rising faster than was predicted in the previous report. Twenty five million people have already been displaced by global climate change. (3)

But there have also been technology advances this spring that indicate that there’s reason for optimism. New materials innovations that are now out of the laboratory and going into production that, when widely adopted in the US, can cap greenhouse gas emissions worldwide. High power, long life batteries that recharge in 10 minutes are now being manufactured in the US that can power both fully electric plug-in vehicles and plug-in hybrids. (4)

The First Practical Electric Drive Vehicle

It used to be that battery electric propulsion was only good for golf carts, fork lifts, and neighborhood cars that went 30mph. But seemingly out of the blue a private Canadian company doing business in Ontario, CA is producing a no compromise, all electric, five passenger sport utility truck (SUT) with a 130 mile range that cruises at highway speeds with the air conditioner running. (5) They’re being marketed to fleet operators to whom they makes great good sense. Using a high power charger, the batteries “fill up” in ten minutes (or over night from a 220 V outlet using the onboard charger). Phoenix Motorcars will introduce an extended range SUV later this year to accommodate families.

Battery Electric Vehicles (BEV)

The Phoenix SUV has performance that’s comparable to a Ford Escape Hybrid (0-60 in less than 10 seconds vs. the Ford at 10.3 seconds). If electricity costs ten cents per kWh, charging the Phoenix will cost $7.00 to go 260 miles. Even getting 34mpg which is great for an SUV, with gas at three dollars per gallon it costs $23.00 to travel that distance in the Ford – over 3 times more.

And that’s only half of the savings story – the maintenance profile of battery electric vehicles is 25% of the most durable internal combustion configurations. How can that be? Well, for openers, the motor has only one moving part.
And then there’s no:

– Transmission to flush or fluid to change
– Cooling system to flush or fluid to change
– Lubrication system or oil & filter to change
– Ignition system to tune or air filter and spark plugs to change
– Exhaust system to rust out or EGR components to maintain
– Fan or fan belts or timing belts to replace
– Front break wear (regenerative breaking instead)
– Lead acid battery to replace (Phoenix batteries last 250,000 miles)

If you’re a fleet operator, the reduced maintenance translates into increased availability that means you need fewer electric vehicles to keep the required number in service – for some fleets that means close to half as many. A 260 mile per day range will get most people where they’re going so much of the time and saves them so much money that renting the right vehicle for extended trips is perfect. But plug-in hybrid cars being planned by GM and Toyota will be able to go 650 miles with the combination of a less costly battery and a gas tank.

Plug-in Hybrid Electric Vehicle (PHEV)

Plug-in hybrids have an all electric drive train, a battery sized to go 40 miles (per day = ~15,000/yr that’s the US average) and on-board gasoline powered generation strong enough to recharge the battery going 70mh down the highway. In normal use this car is inductively charged from a regular outlet using paddles with no exposed metal – commuting will be mostly electric. GM expects a 150,000 mile service life.

Based on common usage profiles, the Volt will average over 150 miles per gallon – three times the mileage of a regular hybrid. In January GM said that they were waiting to produce them while lithium battery technology matured. They must be encouraged by progress since then because this month they announced the transfer of 500 engineers from R&D to Volt production engineering. (6) They now plan to build 1000 vehicles by 2010 and a million in the next five years. It appears that GM’s strategy is to leapfrog the Toyota hybrid franchise to gain a leadership position making plug-in hybrids that get double or more the fuel economy after the cost of electricity is added in and half or less of the combined emissions between the car and the power plant.

GM and Toyota are working with the A123 Company that supplies fast recharge batteries for DeWalt and B&D tools. (7) These batteries do not emit the oxygen (when they heat up during fast charging) that’s emitted by Li-Ion battery packs. And they tolerate heat better to resist thermal runaway issues that plague laptop computers using first generation Li-Ion batteries with a carbon anode and a protective layer that brakes down. (8)

By reducing the internal resistance to a few thousandths of an ohm, the Altair Nanosafeâ„¢ batteries used in the Phoenix SUT eliminate the problem completely because they don’t heat up during fast recharge. (9) These batteries are so heavy duty that AES Corp (1/10 of US power generation) has invested a chunk of money and gotten a seat on Altair’s board. They’re interested in being able to get high capacity battery installations that can respond to load fluctuations that come and go in abrupt chunks giving their generators time to adjust and to time-shift ad hoc generation from wind that’s a growing part of what they do. (10)

Implications of Transport Electrification

Even though the battery problems appear to have been solved, widespread adoption of plug-in transit is not assured while it threatens oil company profits. Compared to a Prius (45mpg), an electric power plant burns one half of the oil and emits one third of the carbon dioxide (well to wheel) per mile to power a Phoenix SUV. (11) Plug-in hybrid and battery electric sedans comparable to the Prius will be even more efficient and that means if they become popular we will use a lot less oil.

It’s within our technical and manufacturing ability to convert enough of the cars in the US to plug-in electric transport to cut oil utilization by half or more in the next decade – about the amount we now import. This is coming just in time; some estimates show world oil production peaking in 10 years. Aside from doubling the time it will take to deplete oil supplies, the impact on international politics and economics would be something to see. If we stop importing oil:

– The issues mid-east Arabs & Persians have with America become abstract
– …except that the price of oil declines as demand is curtailed.
– Trade deficits are cut sharply when oil leaves the picture.
– Pressure on interest rates and inflation abates.
– World-wide carbon emissions are rolled back by electrification in the US alone.
– Developing countries leapfrog directly to electric transport and save money.

Oil companies have been successful at derailing conservation initiatives thus far. It’s unfortunate but arguable that they have a duty to their stockholders to be diligent at protecting their market. Even if public opinion coalesces unsympathetically as Mr. Woolsey predicts, these companies have the clout and the resources & creativity to act all over the map to sour opinions and place bumps in the road. (12)

The Problem with Oil Company Opposition to Conservation

I worry about the wealth of opportunities there are out there for organized oil interests to hamper the progress of changes that promote conservation. They are currently running an ad campaign that advocates increasing oil production with no mention of conservation to meet growing energy needs.

Though novel, it would be equitable and pertinent to enact a modest carbon tax (about 13¢/gallon) to fund a proportionate stock buy-back program to stabilize affected corporate earnings per share (eps) as their output scales back because of transport electrification efficiencies. And the capital would be freed-up for investment in other ventures. I’d give a lot to avoid the opposition we can expect from embattled oil companies unless there’s something to alter their view. 13¢/gallon doesn’t seem so bad if it gets them to join the club of everyone else and support the wholesale conservation that it will take to stabilize the climate and preserve our shorelines.

I know, I know – this looks like shameless corporate welfare but it really isn’t. These stocks are so widely held (1.75 Trillion Oil & Gas Sector market capitalization) that there will not be a material transfer of wealth and the money doesn’t go to the corporations anyway – it makes stockholders whole like your parents who depend on a pension or a mutual fund for retirement income. Indeed, market driven creative destruction is not to the point – these companies will continue to be valuable for the foreseeable future while their output is used more sparingly.

Consumers are slow to adopt change. Spending big bucks on a car, many people want to have as little drama as possible – that’s why mouse-gray Camrys are so popular. But times are changing and electrification is so beneficial that it’s only a matter of time until the word gets out. Toyota plans to make a million hybrids in 2010 and GM is right behind with plans to build a million plug-in hybrids by 2012. From there, production from all manufacturers must scale up tenfold to be able to hit that 84% replacement sweet spot by 2020.

On the other hand if you like drama, live in California, and have an extra $96K burning a hole in your pocket take a look at the all electric Lotus-based Tesla Roadster. (13) It goes from 0-60 mph in 3.9 seconds, 250 miles on a charge, has a 130 mph top speed, and it’s drop dead gorgeous. (13) Powered by nearly 7,000 liquid cooled Li-ion laptop batteries, the 250 hp motor that produces full torque from a standing start, is the size of a watermelon, and weighs 70 pounds. They’re being produced now.

And there are the Th!nk (14), Zap-X (15), and a radical Mini QED (16) having 160hp motors in all four wheels (this adds only 4lb to unsprung weight because the breaks are eliminated) in development.

1 www.boozallen.com/media/file/Gentleman_Start_Your_Plug-Ins.pdf

2 www.autobloggreen.com/2007/01/07/detroit-auto-show-its-here-gms-plug-in-hybrid-is-the-chevy-v/

3 en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Intergovernmental_Panel_on_Climate_Change

4 www.altairnano.com/markets_amps.html

5 www.phoenixmotorcars.com/

6 www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&sid=abR.mR3rTSuQ&refer=home

7 www.a123systems.com/newsite/index.php#

8 Popular Science, July 2007, p38 – SUPER CHARGED

9 www.podtech.net/home/3227/aerovironment-charging-ahead

10 www.altairnano.com/documents/SHM_07_Presentation.pdf (Page 24)

11 www.teslamotors.com/display_data/twentyfirstcenturycar.pdf

12 www.pbs.org/now/shows/223/

13 www.teslamotors.com/

14 www.21stcentury.co.uk/cars/ford_th!nk.asp

15 www.zapworld.com/ZAPWorld.aspx?id=4560

16 www.worldcarfans.com/news.cfm/country/ecf/newsID/2060724.006/mini/pml-builds-640hp-electric-mini


Tags: Electricity, Energy Policy, Fossil Fuels, Oil, Transportation