Oil – July 30

July 30, 2006

Click on the headline (link) for the full text.

Many more articles are available through the Energy Bulletin homepage


It’s not all about oil

Jeff Donn, Associated Press
Analysis: Gas prices rise independently, drop more slowly

Refineries such as this Chevron facility in Richmond may be largely responsible for gas prices, an Associated Press study finds.
—-
U.S. oil companies blame the global oil market for high gasoline prices, but a close analysis of pricing suggests it’s not so simple: The run-up at the pump also comes from domestic refining, which is largely controlled by Big Oil.

The Associated Press examined pricing trends since 1999, which was the starting bell for the modern era of pricier gasoline, and asked several economists to analyze the results. It found evidence that:

The portion of gas prices tied to refining has ballooned on its own, apart from oil.

The suspicion of frustrated drivers is correct: After upward spikes, the price of gasoline drops back more slowly than the price of oil — and someone pockets the difference.

…If that’s true, gas prices most likely will remain high, regardless of what oil prices do, said Sean Comey, a spokesman for AAA of Northern California, which tracks gasoline prices in the state.

“If the oil companies are selling as much gas at $2 a gallon as they are at $3.15, where’s the incentive for them to lower prices?” Comey said. “That’s why we are trying to encourage people to conserve. Even small cutbacks can make a big difference.”
(29 July 2006)


Oil execs speak out

Lynn J. Cook, Houston Chronicle
High prices, war in the Middle East and global warming concerns have transformed energy from a dull industry taken for granted by many Americans into a top-of-the-mind pocketbook issue for consumers.

The Chronicle posed 10 questions to several top executives of the world’s major oil companies on topics ranging from gasoline prices to U.S. energy security to hefty company profits.

Some of the CEO answers — delivered by e-mail last week as BP, Royal Dutch Shell and ConocoPhillips were reporting their second quarter financial results — might be surprising.

James Mulva, head of Houston-based ConocoPhillips, supports the idea of raising fuel efficiency standards, forcing automakers to build vehicles that get more miles to the gallon.

Robert Malone, BP’s new chairman of U.S. operations, said he wanted to buy a hybrid pickup truck but couldn’t find one that was American-made. He opted for an E-85 — ethanol-ready — truck instead.

And John Hofmeister, president of Shell Oil Co., declared “The debate is over about climate change.”

Some answers were edited for length.
Read the Q&A for:
• James Mulva, Conoco-Philips
• Robert Malone, British Petroleum
• John Hofmeister, Shell Oil Co.
(30 July 2006)


Oil boom puts stress on water supply

Hanneke Brooymans, The Edmonton Journal
Groundwater quality, survival of fish at stake
—-
This increased scrutiny of the oilpatch’s water use has made the industry nervous. Boutilier says the Canadian Association of Petroleum Producers recently asked him, “Why are you picking on us? What about agriculture?”

Agriculture accounted for 46 per cent of the province’s total water allocations in 2001. But Boutilier notes that the sector has already improved its water use efficiency by 30 per cent.

In Alberta in 2004, more than seven per cent of all water allocations was for the production of oil and gas, according to a report on the industry’s use of water by the Pembina Institute, an environmental think-tank. The proportion of groundwater allocations is far higher, at 37 per cent.
(29 July 2006)


Tags: Fossil Fuels, Industry, Oil

Comments

Welcome to the new Resillience commenting system!

We have moved from the former Disqus commenting system to a new system as of September 10, 2026.

  • Your past comments have not disappeared.
  • You can log in with your old Disqus credentials, as well as Gmail credentials or a Resilience account (formerly Resilience+). Login with Facebook and other credentials is coming soon.

We made this change because of privacy concerns regarding Disqus. It's also part of a set of changes to bring more services to the Resilience community under a single login: commenting, (coming September 2026), and online courses (coming 2027). Unfortunately, your old Disqus comments may not reliably link to your account in this new system. Please contact us if you have any questions or concerns.

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted