Climate – Dec 2

CO2 emission growth rates – doubled since 90s

Nepal’s farmers on front line of climate change
Global warming: worry, don’t panic

OPEC resurgent – Dec 2

US urges Opec not to cut production
Conflicting signal on need for deeper cut
Bodman on Africa and OPEC
OPEC expansion ups clout
OPEC and the West: Jerome a Paris asks who are our governments working for?

Peak oil – Dec 2

Gazprom City – the new Ozymandias?

Reflections on “The Prize”
TOD’s Nate Hagens interviewed
Peak oil to peak gas is a short ride
Peak Oil passnotes: We were on the money
UK oil production continues decline

Coal – Dec 2

Australia: King coal under siege
Coal or happiness: you can’t have both
Can we lock greenhouse gases away in rocks?
The Southern Appalachians – victims of coal

Ireland & UK – Dec 1

Ireland ‘sleep walking’ to oil crisis
The black hole at the heart of the UK’s energy supply
Lovelock predicts Britain will triumph over global warming

Climate science – Dec 1

Deadly ocean burp
FAO: Livestock a major threat to environment
Massive ice shelf ‘may collapse without warning’

Transport – Dec 1

John Urry on Social Networks
Transport planners asleep at the wheel

Traffic jams, and the rain in Spain

Please fasten your seatbelt and cross your legs…

Food & agriculture – Dec 1

Father of modern arboriculture dies
Pfeiffer’s book on industrial agriculture
Livestock causes 1/5 of human-caused GHGs
BC’s first totally local winter restaurant menu
Ethanol skeptic sees painful realities ahead

Reducing DoD fossil-fuel dependence

Conclusions of the report: “Barring unforeseen circumstances, availability concerns are not a decision driver in the reduction of DoD fossil-fuel use at present. However, the need to improve logistics requirements and military capabilities, and, secondarily, the need to reduce fuel costs, as well as providing a prudent hedge against a foggy future, especially in the Middle East and South America, argue for a reduction in fuel use, in general.”