Building a world of
resilient communities.

MAIN LIST

 

NZ Greens query oil price forecasts

The Green Party's two co-leaders grilled Government officials yesterday about grossly inaccurate forecasts made last October about future oil prices.

The Economic Development Ministry forecast oil would be US$20 a barrel this year, rise to US$25 a barrel by 2020 and be stable thereafter.

The information was based on United States Government and International Energy Agency data.

But Greens co-leader Jeanette Fitzsimons said in questioning ministry officials at the finance and expenditure select committee that within a month of the forecast it had been exceeded and the price was now about US$54 a barrel.

She asked if the ministry was rethinking whether it should broaden the range of sources it used in such forecasts.

Deputy secretary, resources and networks, David Smol, said the ministry was reviewing the assumptions it made in preparing such reports.

It was also considering more frequent updates than once every two or three years - and another may be produced in the first half of 2005.

But he said oil prices were very difficult to predict and it would be a "major undertaking" to independently analyse the market.

Ms Fitzsimons asked if the ministry took sources like the Association for the Study of Peak Oil into account in its forecasting. The association has predicted demand will outstrip supply within 10 years and possibly as early as 2006.

Mr Smol said the ministry looked at a range of sources, and was aware that at one extreme people were arguing the oil peak would be much earlier. "We try to take a broadly mainstream position for our central view of the world and look at variations around that, but it is a very difficult area."

Ms Fitzsimons said later it was worrying New Zealand had no independent ability to analyse the market and had to rely on the Americans.

Meanwhile, Finance Minister Michael Cullen told the committee he had no "trigger point" at which oil would have to fall to before shelving the proposal he revealed last week to defer a proposed petrol tax rise.

Last week in Parliament he revealed he was considering recommending that the Cabinet defer a rise planned for April 1. Dr Cullen had said if oil prices did not fall from present heights the increases might come later by regulation instead of by a bill now before Parliament.

What do you think? Leave a comment below.

Sign up for regular Resilience bulletins direct to your email.

Take action!  

Find out more about Community Resilience. See our COMMUNITIES page
Start your own projects. See our RESOURCES page.
Help build resilience. DONATE NOW.

 

This is a community site and the discussion is moderated. The rules in brief: no personal abuse and no climate denial. Complete Guidelines.


As Nations Embrace Paris Agreement, World’s Existing Fossil Fuels Set to Exceed its Goals

Entitled “The Sky’s Limit: Why the Paris Climate Goals Require a …

Naomi Klein & the Let­down of the Leap Manifesto: Poli­tics Doesn't Trump Physics, Nor the Economics of Collapse (part 2/3)

Politics can be egalitarian when going up Hubbert's Curve, but it's a whole …

Carbon Tracker Analysis: ‘Renewables are Already Outcompeting Fossil Fuels’

Clean technologies are already cheaper, on average, than the incumbent …

Timeline: The Past, Present and Future of Germany’s Energiewende

The Energiewende (energy transition) is an internationally recognised …

The Sower's Way: the Path for the Future

Our paper on "The Sower's Way" has been published in the IOP …

Just 16,000 Catenary Trucks Would Use All of California’s Electricity with only 2400 to 8300 Miles of Overhead Wires

It makes sense to electrify trucks since fuel from oil, coal, and natural …

The Energy-Water Nexus  

Energy and water are inextricably linked: It takes energy to supply water, …