Building a world of
resilient communities.

MAIN LIST

 

Updating world deepwater oil & gas discovery

This a guest post by Jean Laherrère, a long time guest contributor to TheOilDrum.

Defining deepwater oil as the offshore resource found in water depths over 500 m, the data available as of October of 2010 was pointing to an ultimate around 150 Gb. This is the result of an extrapolation made last year:

Figure 1: world deepwater (>500 m) creaming curve 1971-Oct 2010

The previous ultimate estimate in 2008 was 100 Gb, missing the third cycle in subsalt plays.

Figure 2: world deepwater (>500 m) creaming curve 1971-2007

The cumulative discovery versus time with the data up to October of 2010 implied that most discoveries would be made before 2025.

Figure 3: world deepwater (>500 m) cumulative discovery versus time 1971-2009

Applying the Hubbert linearisation method to oil discovery confirmed an ulitmate of about 150 Gb.

Figure 4: world deepwater (>500 m) oil discovery Hubbert linearisation

The average oil field size has been around 100 Mb the last 20 years and a little less for gas in Mboe. At the same time there is a sharp change in the number of fields since 1995: it was less than 10 before that date and has been over 50 since!

Figure 5: world deepwater (>500 m) annual oil & gas size

The plot of cumulative discovery versus field elevation shows that the break for water depth is more about 200 m rather than 500 m.

Figure 6: cumulative 2P discovery versus field elevation per continent (mid 2009)

An update of this forecast was made with the data available up to October of 2011, this time with deepwater defined as the resource lying under 200 m of water or more.

The IHS claims that deepwater is for depths over 400 m, but the database indicates that in the terrain deepwater is for over 200 m deep. In the US Gulf of Mexico the deepwater royalty relief act of 1995 refers to depths over 200 m (656 ft), but the MMS (now BOEMRE) reports depths from 1000 ft onwards. There is little consensus on the definition of deepwater, just as for ultra deep.

The annual crude less extra heavy oil discovery is shown here since 1900, with both definitions of deepwater (>200 m and >500 m).

Figure 7: world annual crude less extra-heavy oil discovery and deepwater (>200 & 500 m)

The same data, now plotted as cumulative discovery.

Figure 8: world cumulative crude less extra-heavy oil discovery and deepwater

The creaming curve for world deepwater oil, this time defined as over 200 m deep, is here extrapolated with two cycles towards 200 Gb, meaning about 50 Gb for the water column interval 200-500 m. There is enough uncertainty to allow a third cycle, with a possible increase in the ultimate, but another new subsalt play is needed!

Figure 9: world deepwater (>200 m) creaming curve 1969-Oct 2011

Combining oil and gas yields a simpler creaming curve, except for the last 200 fields.

Figure 10: world deepwater (>200 m) oil plus gas creaming curve 1969-Oct 2011

The cumulative discovery versus time plot displays a sharp increase in the last 15 years, cause by the subsalt plays.

Figure 11: world deepwater (>200 m) cumulative discovery

The plot for oil discovery per continent shows that Latin America has the sharpest increase due to Brasil. In the past there were jumps in the North Sea with Gullfalks, Troll and Snore in 1978 and in the Caspian with Azeri-Chirag-Guneshli in 1985.

Figure 12: world deepwater (>200 m) cumulative oil discovery per continent

The plot for gas discoveries per continent shows the large jump in 1988 with Shtokman and the recent increase in Asia since 2000.

Figure 13: world deepwater (>200 m) cumulative natural gas discovery per continent

The creaming curve for oil per continent shows that Brasil with the subsalt discoveries has the largest increase and that North America still has some potential, though the average size here is quite less than in Brasil.

Figure 14: world deepwater (>200 m) oil creaming curve per continent 1969-Oct 2011

The creaming curve for gas shows that the best result is for the CIS (Former Soviet Union) with the Barentz and Caspian 9 discoveries. In second comes Asia and the least efficient is North America. The Middle East, with 20 Tcf, mainly from Israel, is at a good start.

Figure 15: world deepwater (>200 m) gas creaming curve per continent 1969-Oct 2011

The average field size is about 100 Mb for oil and 400 Gcf for gas.

Figure 16: world deepwater (>200 m) oil & gas average field size

Conclusion

Subsalt discoveries are now well taken into account in the deepwater oil ultimate and have increased it by around 50 Gb since 2008. It is a significant increase, but very small compared to the uncertainty of the past world oil discovery, with the 300 Gb of speculative resources (confirmed by Sadad Al-Huseini) in OPEC reserves and with the 150 Gb correction from ABC1 reserves (used in scout databases) to 2P reserves. For more than 10 years I corrected the ABC1 reserves data for the FSU by 30 % to reduce them to 2P. This is based on the comparison of ABC1 field data with ultimates obtained from oil decline profiles in some Russian fields. Now Gazprom publishes in their annual report both the ABC1 and 2P reserves, the latter from audits, showing that this 30% correction of is correct for oil and gas (ratio 2P/ABC1 = 70 %); nevertheless this figure seems higher for condensate.

Figure 17: Gazprom reserves ratio 2P/ABC1 2003-2010 from annual reports

Furthermore, I have some doubt on the reliability of some deepwater oil reserves figures. My paper entitled “Deepwater GOM reserves versus production” (part I, part II and part III) shows that the oil estimate of deepwater fields reserves seem optimistic for the Gulf of Mexico, in particular Thunder Horse.

The Brasilian subsalt reservoirs are complex and there is little historical production, with only a pilot project online since October of 2010 in Tupi, now called Lula (already with 14 wells drilled) with 6 Gb of 2P reserves. The BG Group, which holds a 25% stake at Lula, has reported on the first production test with a FPSO, three producing wells and one gas injector. While it was expected to reach maximum production at 100 000 b/d, it actually peaked at 70 000 b/d in December of 2011, and has registered a decline of 5 000 b/d in the following two months.

Figure 18: Lula first production: Oct 2010-Jan 2012 from BP Group

In its 2012 annual report the BG Group forecasts gross production capacity in this play to reach 2.3 Mboe/d in 2017, with a total of 13 FPSO in the Lula, Cernambi (formerly Iracema) and Guara fields.

Deepwater oil production will help reduce the decline in world oil production from aging fields. The IEA claims that four Saudi Arabias need to be discovered up to 2030 to replace the present decline in production (about 5 %/a). The deepwater ultimate is likely to represent less than half of Saudi Arabia’s oil ultimate. It is not enough!

What do you think? Leave a comment below.

Sign up for regular Resilience bulletins direct to your email.

Take action!  

Make connections via our GROUPS page.
Start your own projects. See our RESOURCES page.
Help build resilience. DONATE NOW.