" />
Building a world of
resilient communities.

MAIN LIST

 

Life cycle greenhouse gas emissions from shale gas compared to coal: An analysis of two conflicting studies

A recent series of studies and rebuttals have debated the greenhouse gas impacts of shale gas production as compared to coal. Post Carbon Institute Fellow David Hughes, author of the groundbreaking report, "Will Natural Gas Fuel America in the 21st Century?", provides an analysis of two conflicting studies. His conclusion: Shale gas is worse than coal for the climate over a 30-50 year timeframe, depending upon the technology used.

Abstract

Two studies with conflicting conclusions have recently been produced on full cycle greenhouse gas emissions from shale gas production, one from scientists at Cornell University and another from a scientist at the National Energy Technology Laboratory (NETL). The Cornell study, published in a peer-reviewed journal, suggests that life cycle greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions from shale gas are 20%-100% higher than coal on a 20 year timeframe basis, especially considering that 70% of natural gas consumption is not used for electricity generation. The NETL study, presented in a talk at Cornell University and later posted on the NETL website, suggests, on an electricity-generation comparison basis, that natural gas base load has 48% lower GHG emissions than coal on a 20 year timeframe basis. The NETL comparison, however, does not single out shale gas, which is projected by the U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) to be the major source of natural gas supply growth going forward, or the overall emissions from natural gas-fired electricity generation, focusing instead on the more efficient base load combined cycle component. When the assumptions of the NETL study are examined in detail, and compared to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) 2009 emissions inventory for natural gas, as well as the likely ultimate production from shale gas wells, the resulting conclusions are not significantly different than the Cornell study. Shale gas full cycle greenhouse gas emissions are higher than coal when comparing both the existing electricity generating fleets and best-in-class electricity generation technologies for both fuels over a 20-year timeframe basis, and lower than coal on a 100-year timeframe basis. This has significant policy implications for utilizing natural gas as a “transition” fuel to a low carbon future in mitigating near term greenhouse gas emissions.  

Read the analysis:

»  Download the report (PDF, 4 MB)

»  View on Scribd

Read the main report: Will Natural Gas Fuel America in the 21st Century?

»  Download the complete report (PDF, 93 MB)

»  Download the plain-text version (PDF, 13 MB)

»  View on Scribd

Read the supplemental articles on agriculture, transportation, and health:

»  Download the supplementals (PDF, 1.5 MB)

Like this report?

Keep the information flowing: Donate to Post Carbon Institute

Stay connected: Receive our monthly e-newsletter

Reposting: See our reposting policy

What do you think? Leave a comment below.

Sign up for regular Resilience bulletins direct to your email.

Take action!  

Make connections via our GROUPS page.
Start your own projects. See our RESOURCES page.
Help build resilience. DONATE NOW.


Momentum on Fossil Fuel Divestment Grows as Harvard Professors, Desmond Tutu Call for Action

"People of conscience need to break their ties with corporations …

Years of Recapping Dangerously

Just like on Game of Thrones, where winter is a destabilizing force on all …

Use Your Climate Credit to Ask for More

In the next month, millions of Californians will receive their first …

The Buzz Tour: walking across England to pollinate change on climate

“What can I do about climate change?” “Very little. What …

Living Dangerously

It's happening again, a TV presentation intended to wake people up to the …

Climate Change 2014: Mitigation of Climate Change - headlines

What's in the latest IPCC report?

IPCC Discovers Infographics – Communicates Climate Change

Working Group II put out their state of the climate for AR5 this March and …