Building a world of
resilient communities.

MAIN LIST

 

Methane in well water from gas fracking



Many of you may have seen this kind of video, showing the effects of methane in drinking water near some shale gas extraction wells:


Before now, I've never known what to make of this kind of thing. Is this a very rare, if spectacular occurence, or is it common where shale gas drilling goes on?

Now, there is a paper in this weeks PNAS, Methane contamination of drinking water

accompanying gas-well drilling and hydraulic fracturing
by Osborn et al, researchers at Duke University. It appears to answer the question, and the answer is not good.

Basically, they sampled well water from 68 private wells above the Marcellus and Utica shales in Pennsylvania and New York.  About a third were in an "active extraction area", defined as within 1km of a gas well, while the rest where further away.  They then measured the concentration of methane in the water.

The results are as follows:

You can see that there's an extremely strong effect, with water wells close to gas wells much more likely to show high levels of methane.  Nor are these levels trivial.  Note the scale from 0 to 70 mg/L of methane.  There are no regulations on methane in drinking water (which seems a remarkable fact in itself), but the paper refers to a publication of the Office of Surface Mining, Technical Measures for the Investigation and Mitigation of Fugitive Methane Hazards in Areas of Coal Mining. That report establishes the following guidelines for action:


You can see that a good number of the samples above fall into the >28mg/L category that is potentially explosive and calling for immediate mitigation.  Meanwhile, a considerable majority are above at least the > 10mg/L threshold for concern and warning.

There are a number of other interesting points in the paper, that I'll briefly mention:

  • They do isotopic analysis to establish that the source of the excess methane near gas wells is thermogenic methane from sediments, not biological methane from near the surface.
  • They also tested the water for various possible toxic chemicals from the fracking fluid, but didn't find anything.
  • They also didn't find evidence of high levels of salt or radioactivity suggesting of deep saline aquifer water intruding into the shallow aquifers, at least not in the areas they sampled.

The sample area was as follows:


I have just one potential caveat with the paper.  They don't say anything about exactly how they selected private wells to sample.  They report probability numbers suggesting that they treated it as a random sample.  That could be reasonably implemented, for example, by selecting houses in the study area at random and approaching the homeowners to see if they'd agree to testing.  However, something like advertising in the local paper for people who'd like to have their water tested risks a self-selected population that already suspected problems with their water.  The results would still be interesting, but much less statistically meaningful.  In the absence of any description in the paper, I'm giving them the benefit of the doubt, but I have an email in to the authors querying this point.

At any rate, if this paper holds up it appears that drilling within 1km of household wells presents an unacceptable risk to the residents.

What do you think? Leave a comment below.

Sign up for regular Resilience bulletins direct to your email.

Take action!  

Find out more about Community Resilience. See our COMMUNITIES page
Start your own projects. See our RESOURCES page.
Help build resilience. DONATE NOW.

 

This is a community site and the discussion is moderated. The rules in brief: no personal abuse and no climate denial. Complete Guidelines.


How Can Fossil Fuel Supplies Be Constrained?

Academics gathered in Oxford this week to discuss how to constrain fossil …

As Nations Embrace Paris Agreement, World’s Existing Fossil Fuels Set to Exceed its Goals

Entitled “The Sky’s Limit: Why the Paris Climate Goals Require a …

Naomi Klein & the Let­down of the Leap Manifesto: Poli­tics Doesn't Trump Physics, Nor the Economics of Collapse (part 2/3)

Politics can be egalitarian when going up Hubbert's Curve, but it's a whole …

Carbon Tracker Analysis: ‘Renewables are Already Outcompeting Fossil Fuels’

Clean technologies are already cheaper, on average, than the incumbent …

Timeline: The Past, Present and Future of Germany’s Energiewende

The Energiewende (energy transition) is an internationally recognised …

The Sower's Way: the Path for the Future

Our paper on "The Sower's Way" has been published in the IOP …

Just 16,000 Catenary Trucks Would Use All of California’s Electricity with only 2400 to 8300 Miles of Overhead Wires

It makes sense to electrify trucks since fuel from oil, coal, and natural …