" />
Building a world of
resilient communities.

MAIN LIST

 

Peak oil notes - Sept 9

Prices and production
So far this week, oil has traded around $74-75 a barrel without any particular news to send prices higher or lower. As has become normal, equities and oil jump up or down in accordance with the latest report on the prospects for the economy. Even the smallest scrap of news can have an inordinate effect. Although US stockpiles, especially of gasoline have been growing in recent weeks, this is more a function of how much refiners import as US demand for oil has remained relatively steady around 19.6 million b/d. Prices continue to be supported by solid, if not as spectacular, demand from China and capped by the generally weak outlook for US and OECD economic growth.

The weekly US stocks report, that was delayed for a day because of the holiday, showed a 2 million barrel drop in crude stocks, but left total commercial petroleum inventories nearly unchanged. The EAI report is in marked contrast to the American Petroleum Institute that was released Wednesday night reporting a 7.3 million barrel drop in crude stocks.

A Platts survey shows OPEC production falling 110,000 b/d in August to 29.11 million b/d. A Bloomberg survey has OPEC’s August production falling by 75,000 b/d to 29.15. OPEC is warning that there is likely to be a slowdown in the demand for oil during the rest of this year and foresees increasing production from non-OPEC producers next year.

The BP Report
BP’s long-awaited internal investigation of the causes of the Macondo explosion was released on Wednesday. The report says the explosion, fire, and oil spill were caused by a series of mistakes, but attempts to head off the charge of gross negligence and share the blame with Transocean and Halliburton.

The report was immediately denounced by Transocean and Halliburton as containing many errors and inaccuracies. At stake of course are billions of dollars in liabilities and even criminal prosecutions depending on how the blame for the explosion is ultimately apportioned. This is but one of the opening salvos in a legal dispute which will likely continue for years if not decades.

What do you think? Leave a comment below.

Sign up for regular Resilience bulletins direct to your email.

Take action!  

Find out more about Community Resilience. See our COMMUNITIES page
Start your own projects. See our RESOURCES page.
Help build resilience. DONATE NOW.

 

This is a community site and the discussion is moderated. The rules in brief: no personal abuse and no climate denial. Complete Guidelines.


How Can Fossil Fuel Supplies Be Constrained?

Academics gathered in Oxford this week to discuss how to constrain fossil …

As Nations Embrace Paris Agreement, World’s Existing Fossil Fuels Set to Exceed its Goals

Entitled “The Sky’s Limit: Why the Paris Climate Goals Require a …

Naomi Klein & the Let­down of the Leap Manifesto: Poli­tics Doesn't Trump Physics, Nor the Economics of Collapse (part 2/3)

Politics can be egalitarian when going up Hubbert's Curve, but it's a whole …

Carbon Tracker Analysis: ‘Renewables are Already Outcompeting Fossil Fuels’

Clean technologies are already cheaper, on average, than the incumbent …

Timeline: The Past, Present and Future of Germany’s Energiewende

The Energiewende (energy transition) is an internationally recognised …

The Sower's Way: the Path for the Future

Our paper on "The Sower's Way" has been published in the IOP …

Just 16,000 Catenary Trucks Would Use All of California’s Electricity with only 2400 to 8300 Miles of Overhead Wires

It makes sense to electrify trucks since fuel from oil, coal, and natural …