" />
Building a world of
resilient communities.

MAIN LIST

 

Peak oil notes - Sept 9

Prices and production
So far this week, oil has traded around $74-75 a barrel without any particular news to send prices higher or lower. As has become normal, equities and oil jump up or down in accordance with the latest report on the prospects for the economy. Even the smallest scrap of news can have an inordinate effect. Although US stockpiles, especially of gasoline have been growing in recent weeks, this is more a function of how much refiners import as US demand for oil has remained relatively steady around 19.6 million b/d. Prices continue to be supported by solid, if not as spectacular, demand from China and capped by the generally weak outlook for US and OECD economic growth.

The weekly US stocks report, that was delayed for a day because of the holiday, showed a 2 million barrel drop in crude stocks, but left total commercial petroleum inventories nearly unchanged. The EAI report is in marked contrast to the American Petroleum Institute that was released Wednesday night reporting a 7.3 million barrel drop in crude stocks.

A Platts survey shows OPEC production falling 110,000 b/d in August to 29.11 million b/d. A Bloomberg survey has OPEC’s August production falling by 75,000 b/d to 29.15. OPEC is warning that there is likely to be a slowdown in the demand for oil during the rest of this year and foresees increasing production from non-OPEC producers next year.

The BP Report
BP’s long-awaited internal investigation of the causes of the Macondo explosion was released on Wednesday. The report says the explosion, fire, and oil spill were caused by a series of mistakes, but attempts to head off the charge of gross negligence and share the blame with Transocean and Halliburton.

The report was immediately denounced by Transocean and Halliburton as containing many errors and inaccuracies. At stake of course are billions of dollars in liabilities and even criminal prosecutions depending on how the blame for the explosion is ultimately apportioned. This is but one of the opening salvos in a legal dispute which will likely continue for years if not decades.

What do you think? Leave a comment below.

Sign up for regular Resilience bulletins direct to your email.

Take action!  

Find out more about Community Resilience. See our COMMUNITIES page
Start your own projects. See our RESOURCES page.
Help build resilience. DONATE NOW.

 

This is a community site and the discussion is moderated. The rules in brief: no personal abuse and no climate denial. Complete Guidelines.


The Rise of Community Energy

Around the world, the idea that communities install, own, and enjoy some of …

State of The Transition, November 2016: Steps forward continue to outnumber steps back

The global energy transition remains in a state of net forward momentum as …

World Energy Outlook 2016 – Fatih Birol in Brussels

On 16 November 2016 the International Energy Agency (IEA) presented its …

Waiting for the Climacteric: or, the Return of the Greentard

...I want to broach some wider energy-related issues with the help of two …

Peak Oil Review - Dec 5 2016

A weekly roundup of peak oil news, including: -Quote of the Week -Graphic of …

The Curse of the Modern Office

The information society promises to dematerialise society and make it more …

Howling at the USGS’s Wolfcamp Announcement

The recent USGS announcement about the Wolfcamp play may inspire another …