" />
Building a world of
resilient communities.

MAIN LIST

 

A government says NO to airport expansion

Heathrow constructionThe British government's recent decision to cancel construction of a third runway at London's Heathrow airport marks a major milestone in our adaptation to post-carbon mobility.  This is the first time that a government has canceled plans for major aviation infrastructure expansion due to global, rather than local, concerns about environmental degradation.  In past decades, airport expansions in North America, Europe and Japan have scaled back when surrounding communities mobilized against the prospective increase in aircraft noise and motor vehicle traffic.  But no political jurisdiction has been willing to read the writing on the wall with respect to aviation's future, until now.

Aviation is the most carbon-intensive mobility mode, and it's practically continual growth since the introduction of jet aircraft in the 1950s is not sustainable on either an energy or climate protection basis. Yet many jurisdictions continue to plan for 3 - 5 % annual growth in air travel, in perpetuity, pouring billions into runway and airport terminal infrastructure that will be obsolete on the day they are opened.

The UK's new government has prioritized expanding its high-speed rail network to substitute for short and medium-distance flights.  Given the current economic crisis, the funds to both both high-speed rail and Heathrow's third runway were not available.  Rather than postpone the rail expansion that would expand Great Britain's future mobility options, the government opted to pull the plug on a new runway that would become a stranded asset within the coming decade.

Responding to the predictable howls of outrage from air industry lobbyists, Great Britain's Transport Minister of State for Transport, Teresa Villiers, simply stated 'We decided to make Heathrow better rather than bigger'.  Such prescience merits an award for post-carbon insight and reveals just how newly elected governments can accomplish key changes to prepare their society for a sustainable post-carbon future.  People will look back on July 1, 2010 as a very important day of decision in sustainable transportation.

 

photo credit: Wessex Archaeology on flickr

What do you think? Leave a comment below.

Sign up for regular Resilience bulletins direct to your email.

Take action!  

Find out more about Community Resilience. See our COMMUNITIES page
Start your own projects. See our RESOURCES page.
Help build resilience. DONATE NOW.

 

This is a community site and the discussion is moderated. The rules in brief: no personal abuse and no climate denial. Complete Guidelines.


Alternatives to Capitalism

It is said that capitalism believes in competition but hates competitors. …

Own a Home in Just Four Years? This Co-Op Program Keeps Workers in the Neighborhood

Alex Cedeño quit renting two years ago. Now, he has just two years …

Co-operatives Need to Confront Climate Chaos

The challenges for 2015 are the same ones we've failed as a movement to find …

Making Sense of the Sudden Market Plunge

The global deflationary wave we have been tracking since last fall is …

Back to the Future for Work

What if we’re slowly, or not so slowly, giving up on the idea of work?

Why Is Market Fundamentalism So Tenacious?

One of the great economists of the twentieth century had the misfortune of …

“Don’t Owe. Won’t Pay.” Everything You’ve Been Told About Debt Is Wrong

The legitimacy of a given social order rests on the legitimacy of its debts.