Building a world of
resilient communities.

MAIN LIST

 

When the U.S. energy secretary spoke of "peak oil" ...

... He was referring to the arguments of ASPO that we have already reached peak oil.

The U.S. Secretary of Energy, Steven Chu, knows and understands the issues of global peak oil production. During a talk he gave in March 2005 as director of the Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, a U.S. Department of Energy National Laboratory, Steven Chu advanced the hypothesis of an imminent decline in world production of liquid fuels (ppt 3.6 MB, see p.16) .

Interesting: Steven Chu at the time chose to put forward the thesis of Colin Campbell, founder of the Association for the Study of Peak Oil (ASPO), a research group composed of academics, and especially leading engineers who previously had worked for the oil industry. The arguments of ASPO have been considered as overly pessimistic by most official sources (firms, governments, etc..)

In 2005, Steven Chu held the position of director of Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, part of the DoE.

There Dr. Chu oversaw the work of David Fridley, an expert on the economics of oil who has become an activist in the Transition Town movement.

In a portrait released in 2009, Fridley said :

[Chu] was my boss (...) He knows all about peak oil, but he can't talk about it. If the government announced that peak oil was threatening our economy, Wall Street would crash. He just can't say anything about it.

What was the origin of Steven Chu's prognosis, made before he came to the highly sensitive post of energy secretary to Barack Obama? From the calculations of Dr. Colin Campbell, former vice-president of Fina Group, based on confidential data of the upscale consulting firm IHS .

The numbers of IHS on the planet's oil reserves are significantly more pessimistic than those available on the Internet, including those published by British Petroleum .

The IHS reports are protected by strict copyright. The oil companies and major banks have pay very dearly (but the rate itself is confidential) for access to IHS analysis [see the report published in Le Monde 2 in 2005].

Steven Chu, who received the Nobel Prize for Physics in 1997, could have chosen to rely on the more optimistic prognosis. published then by the Bush Administration, the Department of Energy (DoE) which continues to have the responsible today.

In 2004 for example, the DoE published the hypothesis that oil production would grow smoothly until at least 2037 .

Continued ...

What do you think? Leave a comment below.

Sign up for regular Resilience bulletins direct to your email.

Take action!  

Find out more about Community Resilience. See our COMMUNITIES page
Start your own projects. See our RESOURCES page.
Help build resilience. DONATE NOW.

 

This is a community site and the discussion is moderated. The rules in brief: no personal abuse and no climate denial. Complete Guidelines.


Thoughts on Significance of Solar Impulse as it Finishes Epic Round-the-World Trip

My interview on BBC World Service Newshour: the heroism of the adventurer …

An Industrial Strategy for Energy

What’s also clear is that while nuclear power is tending to get more …

South Australia’s Electricity Price Woes are more Due to Gas than Wind

The past few weeks have seen extraordinarily high wholesale electricity …

Former Inspectors Describe Dangerous Flaws in Construction of Major East Coast Gas Pipeline

In April, a massive explosion ripped through rural Salem Township, …

Northwest Tribes Band Together to Stop Oil-by-Rail

There’s no such thing as a good place for an oil-train derailment, but …

The Role of Development Banks in Energy Transition  

Multilateral Development Banks (MDBs) like the World Bank, the African …

Peak Oil Review - July 18 2016

 A weekly roundup of peak oil news, including: -Oil and the global …