Building a world of
resilient communities.



When the U.S. energy secretary spoke of "peak oil" ...

... He was referring to the arguments of ASPO that we have already reached peak oil.

The U.S. Secretary of Energy, Steven Chu, knows and understands the issues of global peak oil production. During a talk he gave in March 2005 as director of the Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, a U.S. Department of Energy National Laboratory, Steven Chu advanced the hypothesis of an imminent decline in world production of liquid fuels (ppt 3.6 MB, see p.16) .

Interesting: Steven Chu at the time chose to put forward the thesis of Colin Campbell, founder of the Association for the Study of Peak Oil (ASPO), a research group composed of academics, and especially leading engineers who previously had worked for the oil industry. The arguments of ASPO have been considered as overly pessimistic by most official sources (firms, governments, etc..)

In 2005, Steven Chu held the position of director of Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, part of the DoE.

There Dr. Chu oversaw the work of David Fridley, an expert on the economics of oil who has become an activist in the Transition Town movement.

In a portrait released in 2009, Fridley said :

[Chu] was my boss (...) He knows all about peak oil, but he can't talk about it. If the government announced that peak oil was threatening our economy, Wall Street would crash. He just can't say anything about it.

What was the origin of Steven Chu's prognosis, made before he came to the highly sensitive post of energy secretary to Barack Obama? From the calculations of Dr. Colin Campbell, former vice-president of Fina Group, based on confidential data of the upscale consulting firm IHS .

The numbers of IHS on the planet's oil reserves are significantly more pessimistic than those available on the Internet, including those published by British Petroleum .

The IHS reports are protected by strict copyright. The oil companies and major banks have pay very dearly (but the rate itself is confidential) for access to IHS analysis [see the report published in Le Monde 2 in 2005].

Steven Chu, who received the Nobel Prize for Physics in 1997, could have chosen to rely on the more optimistic prognosis. published then by the Bush Administration, the Department of Energy (DoE) which continues to have the responsible today.

In 2004 for example, the DoE published the hypothesis that oil production would grow smoothly until at least 2037 .

Continued ...

What do you think? Leave a comment below.

Sign up for regular Resilience bulletins direct to your email.

Take action!  

Make connections via our GROUPS page.
Start your own projects. See our RESOURCES page.
Help build resilience. DONATE NOW.

Energy Crunch: The end of business as usual for fossil fuels?

It’s the end of business as usual for fossil fuels. That’s …

Peak oil notes - April 17

A mid-week update. Oil prices in London have risen this week on concerns …

Climate Panel Stunner: Avoiding Climate Catastrophe Is Super Cheap — But Only If We Act Now

The U.N. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) has just issued …

Kashagan – Back to the drawing board?

The recent shutdown of Kashagan oil field in Kazakhstan represents one …

King Coal Is Dying a Slow Death in America

In cities choked by pollution and a world coming to grips with the realities …

Peak Oil Review - Apr 14

A weekly review including: Oil and the Global Economy, The Middle East & …

Did crude oil production actually peak in 2005?

Haven't we been hearing from the oil industry and from government and …