" />
Building a world of
resilient communities.



ODAC Newsletter - Mar 12

Welcome to the ODAC Newsletter, a weekly roundup from the Oil Depletion Analysis Centre, the UK registered charity dedicated to raising awareness of peak oil.

What do you do if you're an energy consultancy that finds itself on the wrong side of the peak oil argument just as much of the oil industry and the rest of the world embraces the idea? The solution devised by eternal optimists IHS CERA, hosting a conference in Houston this week, is to sidestep this embarrassing development by simply rebranding the problem: 'peak demand'. However, as analyst and journalist Chris Nelder explains this week, that peak demand actually looks remarkably similar to peak supply. Demand and supply are always in lock-step, and peak demand won't be the cause, it will be the effect of a permanently high-cost, dwindling supply.

At first glance, IHS CERA's views on the US shale gas revolution - outlined in a report published this week - look better considered. They discuss not only the unexpected size of the resource, but also some of the practical and environmental risks. But they appear to miss some major drawbacks.
One issue is how much of the resource can actually be produced, and at what rate. This is a relatively new technology which has achieved dramatic increases in gas production in a short time, but well decline rates are high, so it is unclear how long such growth can be maintained. The jury is also currently out on whether the success with the technology in the US can be replicated in more densely populated areas like Europe.

More fundamentally, it is unlikely the world can afford to burn much if any of its unconventional oil and gas resource and hit climate targets. Modelling by Jim Hansen, director of the NASA Goddard Institute, and Pushker Kharecha of Columbia University, shows that if we burn all the world's conventional oil and gas – which must be overwhelmingly likely – we could still hold atmospheric CO2 to 400-450 parts per million and temperature rise to less than 1°C above the present – rather than pre-industrial – levels, provided we progressively eliminate coal emissions by 2030 and avoid emissions from non-conventional oil and gas altogether. If we burn the unconventionals, we can kiss all that goodbye.

For shale gas to benefit the climate, even in the short term, it would have to displace more polluting forms of generation like coal. But in the absence of tough policy, this seems unlikely, and shale gas consumption will turn out to be additional, and so raise overall emissions rather than cut them. CCS is in its infancy, unlikely to be installed to all coal fired stations, and in any case can never be 100% efficient – it's physically impossible – so there will always be emissions from CCS plants. All in all it's hard to see a boom in shale gas being compatible with achieving climate targets.

In other news this week, while the political fencing match between Washington and Tehran over the latter's nuclear programme continues, the prospect of sanctions looked more likely as Shell joined Vitol, Trafigura and Glencore in ceasing petrol supplies to Iran. Iran is still looking to China for protection against potentially more damaging UN sanctions. It remains to be seen where Beijing feels its interests lie.


Crude Oil Poised for Second Weekly Gain on Recovery Optimism

Back to top

Peak Oil Demand Is Coming, But Here's Why It's Not Good News

Back to top

World crude oil production may peak a decade earlier than some predict

Back to top

'Market can absorb spare Saudi capacity' - Al Falih

Back to top

China Starts Work on Guangdong Strategic Oil Reserves

Back to top


Iraq election turnout 62%, officials say

Back to top


CERA Week:Natural Gas Focus Is Likely To Change Big Oil's Face

Back to top

Europe the new frontier in shale gas rush

Back to top

US EPA chief concerned about gas drilling fluids

Back to top

Chinese demand spurs Shell bid for Arrow's coal gas

Back to top


Energy groups to launch plan for European 'super-grid'

Back to top


New generation of nuclear in doubt

Back to top

Hybrid fusion: the third nuclear option

Back to top


Ed Miliband sinks millions into carbon

Back to top

Energy consumer debt 'hits £132'

Back to top

Grimsby to host a biofuel blockbuster

Back to top

Windfarms find a home near Britain's eyesores

Back to top


China's exports up 46% in February

Back to top

Pound takes new beating on growing trade gap

Back to top


£30bn high-speed rail network gets go-ahead

Back to top

Beijingers get back on their bikes

Back to top

Korea unveils the 'future of transport' — the Online Electric Vehicle

Back to top


Traders cut Iran petrol line

Back to top

Iran says hopes China won't bow to sanctions pressure

Back to top

Vladmir Putin forging ahead with vision of Eurasian empire

Back to top

What do you think? Leave a comment below.

Sign up for regular Resilience bulletins direct to your email.

Take action!  

Find out more about Community Resilience. See our COMMUNITIES page
Start your own projects. See our RESOURCES page.
Help build resilience. DONATE NOW.


This is a community site and the discussion is moderated. The rules in brief: no personal abuse and no climate denial. Complete Guidelines.

While South Carolina Floods, U.S. Wrestles With Urban Stormwater

Among the devastating effects of the low pressure storm system that pummeled …

“Survival Becomes a Spiritual Practice”

Do we have the stamina to not walk away, to stay in this hard place of …

An Unprecedented Future

I can see The Age of Consequences from my home.

Sociocultural Boundaries

As an anthropologist, I see planetary problems from a cultural and …

A New Global Tinderbox: The World’s Northern Forests

Rapidly rising temperatures, changes in precipitation, and increased …

As 'This Changes Everything' Debuts in US, Leave Your Climate Despair at the Door

'People are ready for a deeper, much more systemic critique and much more …

The Miracle of Mals

By banning pesticides in a referendum, the community of Mals in Southern …