If, as I imagine, Shell keeps a similar number of contractors off the books to keep the head-count down, the profit per head is about £70k. If you earned £70k as profit in a business, you probably wouldn't expect to be sand-bagged with a windfall tax by a starving Chancellor.

" />
Building a world of
resilient communities.

MAIN LIST

 

ODAC Guest Commentary - Shell 2007 profits

GUEST COMMENTARY

Shell's 108,000 employees earned "an obscene" £14 billion in profits last year.

If, as I imagine, Shell keeps a similar number of contractors off the books to keep the head-count down, the profit per head is about £70k. If you earned £70k as profit in a business, you probably wouldn't expect to be sand-bagged with a windfall tax by a starving Chancellor. There is also some truth to Shell's defences, "We can't invest profits if we can't keep them", and "We don't profit from petrol, it's tax which is hammering consumers." And nobody gave Shell a handout when the oil price fell below $10.

What is more interesting about Shell's results is this: they didn't publish their reserves. Memorably, they've been known to publish the wrong numbers, but none at all? The most Shell have revealed is that in 2007 they discovered 1 billion barrels of new "resources", including 11 "material discoveries". A field of well under 100 million barrels of "resource" is now material? How have the mighty fallen!

A billion barrels of "resources" means very little. It is not a reserve, it could indicate something or nothing. It's a quantity of petroleum which might or might not be recoverable. Usually less than half of any oil field is actually produceable.

How does this stack up? In 2006 Shell added 2 billion barrels of oil equivalent (i.e. oil + gas) to their "resources". During 2007 they produced almost 1.2 billion barrels of oil and gas. However you look at it, Shell did far worse than in 2006, they have not replaced last year's production, and they are not revealing the actual reserve data.

This is ugly if one of the best explorers just can't find any more conventional oil. And Jeroen Van der Veer, Shell's boss, commented only last week that the world looked set to reach peak oil by 2015. This is not so much joined-up thinking as joined-up consequences.

And don't expect anything better from the other majors - they're all in the same boat. There is nowhere left to look. There are few spots left in the world where a billion barrel field could be hiding. Those few spots are increasingly closed to foreigners as a predictable wave of resource nationalisation sweeps through the industry. Shell not only failed to find much in 2007, Putin even forced them to sell back what they'd already found in Sakhalin-2.

But Shell can't postpone the evil reporting day forever. Eventually it will have to make its annual statement to the American authorities, which must include reserves data. That could make woeful reading.

Richard Miller, BP

Tags:  

Former Soviet Union crude oil exports declined by 5.5 % in last 2 years

Russia is at its 2nd and last oil peak. The easy oil is gone. The FSU export …

Peak oil review - June 17

 A weekly update including: Oil and the Global Economy, The Middle East …

Shale gas, tight oil, and fracking - June 17

•Why America's Shale Oil Boom Could End Sooner Than You Think …

Results may vary: Beware of kaleidoscopic vision in the oil and gas industry

Like children looking through a kaleidoscope who are unaware of its actual …

The Microgrid Solution

“The move to the smart grid is impossible to achieve in one big …

Energy transitions - June 14

•Community Solar Concept A Big Hit At Michigan Energy Fair •A …

EcoChat: Gasland Part II: Courting Controversy, Driving a Movement  

Gasland Part II, the highly anticipated anti-fracking documentary sequel, …