" />
Building a world of
resilient communities.

MAIN LIST

 

Peak phosphorus - the bottom line

Dear Master Gardeners,

Some MGs might find interesting an article that I've just co-written on "Peak Phosphorus" and what it means for agriculture.
energybulletin.net/33164.html

Also at The Oil Drum (which has 102 comments)
www.theoildrum.com/node/2882

Background reading (may be easier to start with):
energybulletin.net/28720.html

As we know from our MG training, phosphorus is one of the three macro-nutrients required by plants. Farmers (both organic and non-organic) use the phosphorus from rock phosphates as fertilizer to replenish the amount used up by crops.

The main points of the article are widely accepted:

  • Phosphates suitable for mining are limited.

  • Modern agriculture needs large amounts of phosphorus to raise enough food for the world population.
  • World demand for phosphorus has grown dramatically during the past decades and shows no sign of declining.
  • There is no substitute for phosphorus.
  • Phosphate production will probably follow a bell-shaped curve, with the most accessible deposits mined first.
  • We currently waste a heck of a lot of phosphorus.

What is new and controversial in the article is the assertion that we have passed the point of "Peak phosphorus" - the point of maximum production and consumption of phosphorus. This would mean that over time phosphorus will become more difficult to obtain, and more expensive. This would be a major problem for society, since without sufficient supplies of phosphorus we will have difficulty feeding ourselves.

My co-author Patrick Déry came to the conclusion that we have passed peak phosphorus by running statistical analyses on data from the US Geological Survey (estimates of phosphate reserves and production). The specific dates for peak phosphorus are what are controversial. The fact that we will run out of phospate deposits is not in dispute. At some point, we will inevitably face a phosphorus problem.

Bottom line for Master Gardeners:

  • Growing food will become much more important than it is now. Our skills and knowledge will be in even greater demand.

  • Recycling nutrients, e.g. through composting, will become more important. Expect to hear more about schemes like "urine diversion" and "humanure." .
  • If I remember correctly, we in Santa Clara are blessed with soils that are abundant in phosphorus. Perhaps an MG expert can verify.
Editorial Notes: A short summary I wrote for the local chapter of Master Gardeners, to which I belong. -BA

What do you think? Leave a comment below.

Sign up for regular Resilience bulletins direct to your email.

Take action!  

Find out more about Community Resilience. See our COMMUNITIES page
Start your own projects. See our RESOURCES page.
Help build resilience. DONATE NOW.

 

This is a community site and the discussion is moderated. The rules in brief: no personal abuse and no climate denial. Complete Guidelines.


#WomeninAg: Words of Wisdom from Women Farmers

For Women’s History Month, CUESA is spotlighting women who are …

An Orchard from a Single Tree

At some point in your childhood, I hope, you ate an apple and hit upon the …

Corporations vs. Communities: a Tale of Two Meetings

In 2015 it shouldn’t be a radical notion to want to move beyond …

Home Growing Produces Ten Times the Food of Arable Farms

So, how is it possible that low-tech vegetable plots out perform modern …

Agroecology: An Idea and Practice Coming of Age

In February, at the International Forum for Agroecology in Nyeleni, Mali, a …

From Miso to Mealworms, Women Cook Up Success

In 2005, La Cocina was founded in San Francisco’s Mission District to …

How to Become a Citizen Eater: A Trip Behind the Labels of Your Ethical Cup of Coffee

The movement for ethically sourced goods goes much deeper than simply buying …