Building a world of
resilient communities.



Gore stays cool on the hot seat

People have asked me what the point is of going into the dialogue of the Congressional hearings on global warming which we have been covering.

The debate that is taking place in the Congress is truly an historical debate: it is a rare debate indeed when it can truly be said that the future of the entire planet turns on the outcome of that debate. Since World War II, only debates over issues involving nuclear weapons and nuclear war have risen to this level.

And the debate over climate change is one that hinges on an understanding of the application of the methods of science to a very complex set of data, from the melting of the Greenland icecap to the intensity of hurricanes in the Gulf of Mexico. For more than a decade, powerful special interests have spent millions of dollars to obscure the facts about global warming with corporate-funded “think tanks” that issued reports filled with half-truths.

The mass media played an unfortunate role in this process, presenting “both sides” of the issue in the name of some fictional “balance,” when the scientific consensus was increasingly solid on the side that human activity was causing global warming.

But as Senator Boxer observed on Wednesday, “elections have consequences,” and one of those consequences is that members of both parties are being forced to discuss their ideas about global warming in the public area of Congressional hearings.

In selecting direct quotations, my goal is to provide illustrations of the underlying nature of the debate, especially of the Republicans’ continued refusal to accept even the existence of global warming as a phenomenon, much less the role of human activity in generating the greenhouse gases that are forcing that warming.

I want readers to have a gut-level appreciation of the nature of this resistance, so that they might have a better sense of the uninformed, fact-resistant mindset which our Representatives and Senators will have to overcome if the Congress is going to pass meaningful legislation.


Morning in the House

Al Gore’s appearance before committees in the House and the Senate on Wednesday was a strictly schizophrenic affair: some moments were an unmitigated love fest, as members welcomed back one of their own, Gore having served on both the House and the Senate committees holding the hearings. But alternating with these heapings of praise were the slings and arrows of outrageous fortune frantically flung by the Republican minority in a desperate effort to tear down Gore personally and discredit his policy message.

...Next stop: the Senate Committee on Environment and Public Works, where the most outspoken opponent of global warming, Senator James Inhofe (R-OK) was waiting. Inhofe was the author of the immortal claim that claims about the threat of global warming was “the greatest hoax ever perpetrated on the American people.”

...Gore tried to reply, but after saying “I don’t want to be rude,” Inhofe persisted in talking over Gore, preventing Gore from responding. Finally Senator Boxer took matters in hand, in a set piece that many will remember for a long time.

Turning to Inhofe, Boxer said, as if to an unruly 3-year old throwing a temper tantrum in a sandbox, “I want to talk to you a minute.” The room got very quiet. Boxer asked Inhofe if he would agree to let the vice president answer his questions. Inhofe began to talk back to her in disagreement, when Boxer held up the gavel, not to pound it, but to display it. Staring Inhofe down, Boxer said:

”You’re not making the rules. You used to when you did this [looking at the gavel] but you don’t do this any more. Elections have consequences.

Whereupon the audience broke out in cheers and laughter.

...Senator Isaacson (R-GA) asked whether nuclear power shouldn’t be a bigger part of the solution to global warming, and asked Gore what he thought. Gore said he had once been a strong supporter of nuclear power, but had become more skeptical, primarily because of cost: “These things [nuclear plants] are expensive, take a long time to build, and at present come in only one size, extra large.” Gore also mentioned the unsolved problem of nuclear waste disposal, and the linkage of nuclear power programs to nuclear weapons proliferation.

Gore went on to urge support for a tax on carbon dioxide, to be offset with reduction of payroll taxes. He opposed the building of any more pulverized coal plants because the amount of nitrogen in the exhaust gases meant such plants could never be retrofitted for carbon capture.

...Senator Ben Cardin (D-MD) was the first to mention public transit as part of the policy mix. He urged Gore to include a slide on public transit in his PowerPoint global warming show. Gore said that light rail was in the movie, and “the redesign of communities also.” This brief exchange was the only mention during the afternoon of the possibility of reducing the impact of global warming through policies that would allow people to be less dependent on cars.

For the complete article, see the original at Global Public Media.

Editorial Notes: Please note that there are still a few honorable Republicans who have not lost their collective minds. According to the LA Times ("Why the right goes nuclear over global warming"), these include Rep. Wayne Gilchrest, as well as research scientists Reps. Roscoe Bartlett (R-Md.) and Vernon Ehlers (R-Mich.). Richard Bell is Washington correspondent for Global Public Media. For more, see his blog and his stories at GPM. According to Bell, publications have permission to re-publish these GPM pieces provided that they credit Global Public Media and include the URL, . Reporters and editors may contact Bell at richardbell AT postcarbon PERIOD org . -BA

What do you think? Leave a comment below.

Sign up for regular Resilience bulletins direct to your email.

Take action!  

Find out more about Community Resilience. See our COMMUNITIES page
Start your own projects. See our RESOURCES page.
Help build resilience. DONATE NOW.


This is a community site and the discussion is moderated. The rules in brief: no personal abuse and no climate denial. Complete Guidelines.

How Two Tribal Women Are Fighting to Protect the Arctic From Oil Drilling

The Gwich'in people of Alaska and Northern Canada have fought for three …

"People’s Hearing" Demands Oversight of FERC for Allegedly Rubber-stamping Pipeline and Gas Projects

Since 1977, the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) has been quietly …

After Flint Failure, EPA Refocuses Federal Drinking Water Role

The lead contamination scandal that unraveled in Flint the last two years …

Climate Science Communication: Trust begets Trust

Why are we failing at communicating the danger of climate change?

Factcheck: Newspaper claim about Global Temperature is ‘Deeply Misleading’

It is all but certain now that 2016 will shatter historical records to be …

Journey to Earthland: Branching Scenarios

Whither Earthland? The only certainty about the future is surprise, the one …

Water, History, and Finance Converge As Sioux Nation Mounts Storied Battle Over Oil Pipeline

Heavy snow and winter cold settled this month on thousands of Native …