Building a world of
resilient communities.

MAIN LIST

 

US lawmakers meddle in CNOOC's Unocal bid

Washington lawmakers who have expressed opposition to CNOOC's US$18.5 billion bid for Unocal Corp have received more than US$100,000 in campaign contributions from rival bidder Chevron since 2002, the Financial Times reported, citing publicly available filings in the US.

That has raised questions over whether Chevron is drumming up a campaign of opposition to the deal, it said in its online edition.

It cited an unidentified person close to CNOOC as saying that Chevron is using its political clout in Washington to try to increase uncertainty over the higher CNOOC bid for Unocal.

"Chevron does not want to do the math, that 67 dollars per share is higher than 60 dollars per share. It is cheaper for Chevron to raise political uncertainty than it is for them to raise their bid," the person was quoted as saying.

But a person close to Chevron denied that the company has summoned Washington lawmakers to come out in opposition to the deal, the paper said.

"These are members of Congress ... they take their own actions. Given the certainty of our offer and the timing of its approval, we believe it is superior at the existing price," the person said.

Richard Pombo, the Republican congressman from California who sent a letter to President George Bush raising concerns about the deal days before a bid by CNOOC was announced, has received US$13,500 from Chevron over the last three years, the report said, citing data compiled by the Center for Responsive Politics.

Pombo's letter was followed by a similar letter signed by 41 House Republicans and Democrats, of which 22 had received political contributions from Chevron in the past three election cycles, the report said.

China angrily responded to a vote by US lawmakers last week that urged the US administration to block CNOOC's 18.5-billion-dollar takeover bid for Unocal.

"We demand that the US Congress correct its mistaken ways of politicizing economic and trade issues and stop interfering in the normal commercial exchanges between enterprises of the two countries," China's foreign ministry said in a statement.

On Thursday, the House of Representatives voted 398-15 for the non-binding resolution, which said the takeover "would threaten to impair the national security of the United States".

Editorial Notes: The UK's Financial Times publishing (what qualifies these days as) investigative journalism into US politics is curious, that its to the benefit of the Chinese national oil company is even curiouser. Is Chevron about to discover that its not that big a fish after all? -LJ

What do you think? Leave a comment below.

Sign up for regular Resilience bulletins direct to your email.

Take action!  

Find out more about Community Resilience. See our COMMUNITIES page
Start your own projects. See our RESOURCES page.
Help build resilience. DONATE NOW.

 

This is a community site and the discussion is moderated. The rules in brief: no personal abuse and no climate denial. Complete Guidelines.


Rural Colorado Leads the Charge for Energy Freedom

Last week the Western Slope Colorado witnessed a huge victory for energy …

“We are in danger of winning. But….”  

First in-depth radio interview on The Winning of the Carbon War, on Radio …

Renewable Energy Redoubles its Global Reach

A significant threshold has been crossed by renewable energy as analysts …

Peak Oil Review - June 29

A weekly review in including Oil and the Global Economy, The Middle East …

Energy Crunch - six months to go

With fewer than six months to go until the UN climate summit in Paris, …

BP Data Suggests We Are Reaching Peak Energy Demand

The real situation is that we right now seem to be reaching peak energy …

Peak Oil Notes - June 25

A midweek update. There was little change in oil prices so far this week as …