Building a world of
resilient communities.

MAIN LIST

 

Kazakhstan wants stake in oil field

LONDON Kazakhstan is determined to take a stake in the country's Kashagan oil field, signaling that there might be further turmoil in the development of the world's largest oil find in more than three decades, according to the country's top energy official.

"Does a country have a right to purchase a stake in a project that is its own?" Vladimir Shkolnik, Kazakhstan's minister of energy and mineral resources, asked during an interview Monday in a London hotel.

"Of course, it has the right to buy such a stake," he answered himself. "The asset belongs to the state anyway."

At issue is nearly one-fifth of the Kashagan oil field, which lies under the Caspian Sea. The area will cost about $29 billion to develop and yield a projected 13 billion barrels of oil. But the project has been beset by delays, and although oil was originally expected to flow in 2005, that date has been pushed back to 2008.

BG Group, ENI, Royal Dutch/Shell Group, Exxon Mobil, Total, ConocoPhillips and Inpex of Japan agreed to develop the field after its discovery in 2000; BG, formerly British Gas, has since opted to sell its 16.67 percent stake.

The oil companies involved say the contract they signed gives them pre-emption, the right and responsibility to offer their stake to another company within the group, with the exception of Inpex, before offering it to an outsider.

"The partners have a right to pre-empt, and we have a right to assign our share within the consortium," said a BG spokeswoman, Petrina Fahey. BG is in talks with the six other companies that have stakes in the project, Fahey said.

The Kazakhstan government disagreed. "If Kazakhstan has direct participation in such a project, the project will move much faster," Shkolnik said.

The government has been discussing a proposal that would allow the country to buy some below-ground rights in projects, and oil industry specialists say the decision to buy into Kashagan may have stemmed from the talks.

The New York Times

What do you think? Leave a comment below.

Sign up for regular Resilience bulletins direct to your email.

Take action!  

Find out more about Community Resilience. See our COMMUNITIES page
Start your own projects. See our RESOURCES page.
Help build resilience. DONATE NOW.

 

This is a community site and the discussion is moderated. The rules in brief: no personal abuse and no climate denial. Complete Guidelines.


Naomi Klein & the Let­down of the Leap Manifesto: Poli­tics Doesn't Trump Physics, Nor the Economics of Collapse (part 2/3)

Politics can be egalitarian when going up Hubbert's Curve, but it's a whole …

Carbon Tracker Analysis: ‘Renewables are Already Outcompeting Fossil Fuels’

Clean technologies are already cheaper, on average, than the incumbent …

Timeline: The Past, Present and Future of Germany’s Energiewende

The Energiewende (energy transition) is an internationally recognised …

The Sower's Way: the Path for the Future

Our paper on "The Sower's Way" has been published in the IOP …

Just 16,000 Catenary Trucks Would Use All of California’s Electricity with only 2400 to 8300 Miles of Overhead Wires

It makes sense to electrify trucks since fuel from oil, coal, and natural …

The Energy-Water Nexus  

Energy and water are inextricably linked: It takes energy to supply water, …

Peak Oil Review - Sept 19 2016

 A weekly roundup of peak oil news, including: -Quote of the week …