" />
Building a world of
resilient communities.

MAIN LIST

 

Shell reassesses reserves for third time

Shell has, for the third time this year, cut its estimate of it proven oil reserves, adding that it was slicing more than $400 million from profits to account for the "disturbing deficiencies" in its reporting practices.

The oil giant also confirmed that Judy Boynton was to step aside as finance director in the third senior departure since the company in January revealed its first downgrade of reserves previously classified as "proven".

This morning's statement, which took to 4.35 billion barrels of oil the level of proven reserves recategorised for 2002 with a further 0.5 billion barrels of oil downgraded for 2003, follows the findings of an investigation Shell commissioned by consultants in January.

A 463-page report lodged late last month revealed that Sir Philip Watt, who resigned as Shell chairman in March, and Walter van der Vijver, who quit as of exploration and production, had for two years discussed the rebooking of reserves.

While Mr van der Vijver, who is fighting allegations over his own role in the debacle, last November said he was "sick and tired about lying" about the reserves revisions that "need to be done" he in December ordered the destruction of a document warning of the widespread implications of reclassification.

Lord Oxburgh and Aad Jacobs, chairmen of Shell's UK and Dutch boards, said in a joint statement this morning: "The report revealed disturbing deficiencies in our past reserves reporting practices and the manner in which Shell dealt with those issues."

This morning's downgrade lowered to 60 per cent the level of output that Shell replaced through new finds last year.

The company said it was reducing net earnings for four years to 2003 by $100 million a year.

Shell shares stood 1.75p lower at 391p in morning trade.

What do you think? Leave a comment below.

Sign up for regular Resilience bulletins direct to your email.

Take action!  

Find out more about Community Resilience. See our COMMUNITIES page
Start your own projects. See our RESOURCES page.
Help build resilience. DONATE NOW.

 

This is a community site and the discussion is moderated. The rules in brief: no personal abuse and no climate denial. Complete Guidelines.

Tags:  

The Most Important and Misleading Assumption in the World

Why should we make policy using economic models that don’t reflect …

How Can Fossil Fuel Supplies Be Constrained?

Academics gathered in Oxford this week to discuss how to constrain fossil …

As Nations Embrace Paris Agreement, World’s Existing Fossil Fuels Set to Exceed its Goals

Entitled “The Sky’s Limit: Why the Paris Climate Goals Require a …

Naomi Klein & the Let­down of the Leap Manifesto: Poli­tics Doesn't Trump Physics, Nor the Economics of Collapse (part 2/3)

Politics can be egalitarian when going up Hubbert's Curve, but it's a whole …

Carbon Tracker Analysis: ‘Renewables are Already Outcompeting Fossil Fuels’

Clean technologies are already cheaper, on average, than the incumbent …

Timeline: The Past, Present and Future of Germany’s Energiewende

The Energiewende (energy transition) is an internationally recognised …

The Sower's Way: the Path for the Future

Our paper on "The Sower's Way" has been published in the IOP …